@luce-anon@lizzie can you explain to me why the trinity? christianity has a lot of objectionable dogmas, but the trinity just seems straightforwardly to be a rejection of the oneness of God.
@technicallydifficult@lizzie@luce-anon@salt I think the story of Adam and eve is rather deep. its a reflection on the unique position of man between animal and God, the blessing and burden of sapience. original sin is like the worst form of karma though.
If you want to know about Adam and Hawa (peace upon them), their story isn't that deep. Like, we don't see them as particularly deviant or as the origin of sin. They were lied to by Iblees, so even though they made an error in judgement, it was more that they were kinda nieve rather than flagrantly disregarding the rules. So when Adam repented of his error, he was forgiven. And of course, the sins of one person are the sins of only that person.
So you are trying to figure out if Muslims have original sin, and the answer is, no, absolutely not. We are not born in a sinful condition as a result of Adam eating some fruit.
Also, there's still time for Iblees to repent. The time between the sins of Iblees and the day of Judgement is metaphorically like a "go to your room and think about what you did" kind of thing. And instead of reflecting on his mistakes and repenting, he's decided to smear his shit all over the walls. My mom woulda beat my ass for that.
@lizzie@luce-anon that just seems so arbitrary. like true religion got revealed with little to no warning one day after thousands and thousands of years of humanity being around? AND even then it wasn't perfect. why would God do that? because for me by far the most compelling argument for the truth of my religion is that it's exactly the same one that adam (saw) followed.
and more importantly, if jesus revealed such divine truths, why was he so cagey and confusing about everything? why did it take people who were supposedly taught by God directly hundreds of years to understand what he was saying, even on fundamental ideas? if the people who could ask jesus directly what he meant didn't believe in the trinity, and it's not made explicit in the bible, but it's still supposed to be a vital and fundamental part of the true religion, where did it come from?
@salt@luce-anon and it still took a couple centuries of people going “wtf did Jesus mean when he said “Father, Son, and Holy Spirit”” to really get it in the terms we would use today
@lizzie@luce-anon okay i can follow that. though it still doesn't answer my question. did the trinity exist as an idea before the coming of your savior?
@lizzie@luce-anon this is basically unintelligible to me as a monotheist. though it would have made sense to me before, when i was a polytheist, which really makes it look like polytheism. but i don't want to argue with people of the book and i'm sure i wouldn't present anything you hadn't already heard. i'm just still very confused as to *why*. like i know what the trinity is, you've admitted it's shirk so i wasn't confused or anything. it's just such a random and arbitrary idea i don't understand where it comes from or why anyone who's actually thought about it would believe it.
@salt@luce-anon tbh i will probably get something wrong here bc the trinity is genuinely very weird. each person is the whole undivided essence, and there is nothing accomplished by God that is not accomplished by any given person. there is no creation apart from the son, no sanctification apart from the father, and no incarnation apart from the spirit. we do, however, relate to them in different ways as we relate differently to different people. similarly, they relate and interact with one another, and we would often describe the roles they play in different things in different terms
@salt@luce-anon it totally is a rejection of the oneness of God as a muslim (for example) would conceive of it, and thats not a problem bc that simply isnt one of our concerns
@lizzie@luce-anon okay. if that grounding is one essence though, why are there three persons? in what way do they relate to the essence? what the hell is even a "person" supposed to be in this sense?
@salt@luce-anon i mean, God is love. love is for the other. life is being born in all things.
upholding the oneness of God isnt really a goal of christianity in the first place. what makes christianity monotheistic isnt that its a case of polytheism where n=1, its that its concerned with the ground into which being is written, which is necessarily one essence
@georgia@luce-anon@salt@technicallydifficult though ig original sin is less a sort of karma in itself and more the establishment of the conditions in which karma-like tendencies thrive (Adam took law from the tree in a sense)
Karma is kind of a cause and effect system, Christians appear to use a one and done scapegoat system. Muslims just apologize and try to do better than they did before. Not to throw shade at christians, but the scapegoat thing doesn't exactly lend itself to accountability.
@georgia@lizzie@luce-anon@salt@technicallydifficult I think "institutes" is almost too strong of a word here, it's a choice but only in the most technical sense, given both full foreknowledge of the course of events as well as being compelled by omnibenevolence to seek out the resolving of the ultimate good at a defined point in time and space, as typified in the incarnation
@technicallydifficult@georgia@luce-anon@salt penal substitutionary elements do have their place in the broader church but full forensic atonement is historically unusual. the whole point of the scapegoat thing is that scapegoating is the way of a fallen world
@salt@georgia@luce-anon@technicallydifficult i mean we would argue that islam’s pursuit of simplicity has led it into falsehood. from the outside islam looks like its just missing a lot and fails to see the full degree of brokenness in the world nor the degree to which it will be made whole
Allah (swt) gives a clear warning, and has equipped humans with the tools to understand it since the time of adam (saw). you don't need philosophy to understand it, you don't need to wrap your head around hypostases and incarnation and original sin and so on. the message is simple and clear, and presented in concrete terms which anyone could grasp.
regardless of whether philosophy is necessary for christian salvation on an individual level, it still pervades christian psychology and belief systems. and mistaking the products of your abstract reasoning as reality inevitably leads to falsehood.