Journalist challenge: Use “Machine Learning” when you mean machine learning and “LLM” when you mean LLM. Ditch “AI” as a catch-all term, it’s not useful for readers and it helps companies trying to confuse the public by obscuring the roles played by different technologies.
Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
Robert “The Bobby Yaga” McNees (mcnees@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 23-Nov-2025 03:23:25 JST
Robert “The Bobby Yaga” McNees
- GreenSkyOverMe (Monika) repeated this.
-
Embed this notice
Robert “The Bobby Yaga” McNees (mcnees@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 23-Nov-2025 13:00:12 JST
Robert “The Bobby Yaga” McNees
Machine learning (umbrella term, I know) is a useful, sometimes transformative tool in the hands of trained researchers who understand how to deploy it and critically assess the results.
A chatbot is not useful in the same ways (though underlying technologies may be, in other contexts).
GreenSkyOverMe (Monika) repeated this. -
Embed this notice
Rich Felker (dalias@hachyderm.io)'s status on Sunday, 23-Nov-2025 13:00:12 JST
Rich Felker
@mcnees Honestly get rid of "machine learning" too. It's a marketing term like "AI", intended to bedazzle non experts. Unless you're qualified to elaborate more on the specific methods involved, call it "statistical analysis".
-
Embed this notice
Robert “The Bobby Yaga” McNees (mcnees@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 23-Nov-2025 16:04:43 JST
Robert “The Bobby Yaga” McNees
Lumping them together as “AI” gives readers the impression that a single class of tool is discerning novel protein structures, teasing subtle patterns out of mountains of LHC data, writing a student’s History 101 paper for them, and arguing that a ketamine-addled billionaire could post up Shaq in his prime. No.
GreenSkyOverMe (Monika) repeated this. -
Embed this notice
Robert “The Bobby Yaga” McNees (mcnees@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 23-Nov-2025 16:05:29 JST
Robert “The Bobby Yaga” McNees
This is a marketing trick that helps the Sam Altmans of the world steal Machine Learning valor to prop up a bunch of gross plagiarism machines that have all our worst biases and failings baked in.
Do not help them!
-
Embed this notice
Rich Felker (dalias@hachyderm.io)'s status on Tuesday, 25-Nov-2025 03:50:02 JST
Rich Felker
@hosford42 @mcnees What I mean is that "ML" is just automating the process of doing that statistical modelling. It's not "learning". Calling it "learning" is explicitly anthropomorphizing it for the sake of marketing (bedazzling the people who are the sources of your funding).
-
Embed this notice
Aaron (hosford42@techhub.social)'s status on Tuesday, 25-Nov-2025 03:50:03 JST
Aaron
I would argue this particular point. Most of what I do for a living as an ML engineer/researcher is *not* statistical analysis. There's plenty of both in the mix, but they are not the same. If you were to call it "statistical modeling", I might be more inclined to agree with you.