Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Paul Cantrell (inthehands@hachyderm.io)'s status on Wednesday, 15-Oct-2025 09:53:06 JST Paul Cantrell

   You know what’s really underrated?

   Social opprobrium.

   🧵

   • Embed this notice
     Paul Cantrell (inthehands@hachyderm.io)'s status on Wednesday, 15-Oct-2025 09:57:39 JST Paul Cantrell

     in reply to

     Like, these Young Republicans in their Telegram chat spouting just the must vile stuff imaginable? They should feel ashamed and embarrassed. The people around them should •make• them feel ashamed and embarrassed about it.

   • Embed this notice
     Paul Cantrell (inthehands@hachyderm.io)'s status on Wednesday, 15-Oct-2025 10:01:50 JST Paul Cantrell

     in reply to

     They’re not putting forward some thoughtful but controversial theory of whatever. They’re not saying things that Deserve Respect Even If We Disagree. This isn’t that kind of communication. They’re fantasizing about enslavement and gas chambers. There’s nothing to be learned from an Honest Exchange of Views Followed by Thoughtful Reflection here.

   • Embed this notice
     Paul Cantrell (inthehands@hachyderm.io)'s status on Wednesday, 15-Oct-2025 10:03:41 JST Paul Cantrell

     in reply to

     There is, however, a lot for society to gain from the people who want to subjugation and slavery and murder knowing that they will be pariahs if they let those thoughts out of their mouth. There’s a lot to gain from everyone around them seeing them greeted with revulsion and shunned.

     That, too, is part of free speech. It is the •foundation• of free speech.

   • Embed this notice
     Paul Cantrell (inthehands@hachyderm.io)'s status on Wednesday, 15-Oct-2025 10:08:13 JST Paul Cantrell

     in reply to

     The First Amendment in the US says — wisely — that we should avoid giving the government the power to determine with the force of law what beliefs are unacceptable. That is •not• because all beliefs are acceptable, however; it is because giving the government such power opens the floodgates of authoritarianism.

     Here’s the thing: some beliefs •are• unacceptable. We deny the government the power to determine which ones with the understanding that we •must• do that job ourselves, through social negotiation.

   • Embed this notice
     Paul Cantrell (inthehands@hachyderm.io)'s status on Wednesday, 15-Oct-2025 10:09:02 JST Paul Cantrell

     in reply to

     Social opprobrium is not antithetical to free speech. It is a •pillar• of free speech. It is the premise upon which the First Amendment is built.

   • Embed this notice
     Paul Cantrell (inthehands@hachyderm.io)'s status on Wednesday, 15-Oct-2025 10:11:10 JST Paul Cantrell

     in reply to

     And what happens when we fail to do our job, fail to treat with revulsion speech that deserves revulsion? What happens when we give racists and slavers and genocidal zealots room, whether out of some misguided sense of respect, or laziness, or fear?

     You know the answer to this question.

   • Embed this notice
     Paul Cantrell (inthehands@hachyderm.io)'s status on Wednesday, 15-Oct-2025 10:16:59 JST Paul Cantrell

     in reply to

     The alternative to a society with shaming and shunning is a society filled with violence: the violence of racists and slavers and genocidal zealots; the violence of prying those people from power as they inevitably close off democracy’s nonviolent means of removing them.

     I do not like violence. I do not want violence.

     I much prefer harsh words.

   • Embed this notice
     Paul Cantrell (inthehands@hachyderm.io)'s status on Wednesday, 15-Oct-2025 10:17:34 JST Paul Cantrell

     in reply to

     The tragedy of Charlie Kirk is that a vile person like that we’ve even heard of him, that a vile person like that managed to hold so many microphones for so long.

     He shouldn’t have been shot. He should have been cut off by everyone in every space where he tried to hold the microphone, shamed into living isolated and miserable in his mom’s basement where nobody would ever feel the need to shoot him.

   • Embed this notice
     Paul Cantrell (inthehands@hachyderm.io)'s status on Wednesday, 15-Oct-2025 10:23:01 JST Paul Cantrell

     in reply to

     There was a time in the not-so-distant past when we could have avoided incredible harm to incredible numbers of people here in the US simply by giving the absolute stink eye to people spouting deranged fascist crap, by saying “ugh, wtf, get out of here” instead of finding ways to describe fascism politely enough to give it equal time in the news.

     I don’t know what’s coming. I hope for the best; I fear the worst. But shunning and shaming sound so, so, so much better than even the best-case scenarios that follow from here.

   • Embed this notice
     Paul Cantrell (inthehands@hachyderm.io)'s status on Wednesday, 15-Oct-2025 10:23:44 JST Paul Cantrell

     in reply to

     You know what’s underrated?

     Social opprobrium.

   • Embed this notice
     The Corodon (thecorodon@wandering.shop)'s status on Wednesday, 15-Oct-2025 10:32:12 JST The Corodon

     in reply to

     @inthehands
     I would just add that if they're openly racist in private, their exchange of views in public is neither honest nor open. And if we don't tell them they are disgusting, we aren't being honest or open with them.

   • Embed this notice
     Paul Cantrell (inthehands@hachyderm.io)'s status on Wednesday, 15-Oct-2025 10:36:50 JST Paul Cantrell

     in reply to

     • Hasani Hunter

     @hasani
     Oh, indeed, as best we can tell, he was shot for Nick Fuentes’s beliefs.

     And I do think it’s likely that the shooter really was what he appeared to be: a fellow right-wing fuckup. I’m slow to think there’s any sort of MAGA conspiracy behind it: partly because they’re not competent enough, and partly because their MO doesn’t •need• a conspiracy. The Trump Way is to sow chaos with no plan whatsoever, then be the craven opportunist who can best seize the advantage of the chaos whenever it arrives.

     And •that• is mostly certainly what they were doing at his funeral.

   • Embed this notice
     Hasani Hunter (hasani@my-spaces.social)'s status on Wednesday, 15-Oct-2025 10:36:51 JST Hasani Hunter

     in reply to

     @inthehands I’m not convinced that Kirk was shot for his beliefs or his speech. From the behavior of his wife and the Trump rally at his memorial, his death is being used as a cover for suppressing speech of their political enemies.

   • Embed this notice
     Paul Cantrell (inthehands@hachyderm.io)'s status on Wednesday, 15-Oct-2025 10:44:45 JST Paul Cantrell

     in reply to

     • Misuse Case

     @MisuseCase
     That’s far, far kinder than anything I could think of.

   • Embed this notice
     Misuse Case (misusecase@twit.social)'s status on Wednesday, 15-Oct-2025 10:44:46 JST Misuse Case

     in reply to

     @inthehands At best they are talking like dweebs who peaked in middle school.