What an abomination! The word "Libreboot/librebooted" means nothing at this point!
This again shows why allowing even a single non-free software is big slippery slope.
What an abomination! The word "Libreboot/librebooted" means nothing at this point!
This again shows why allowing even a single non-free software is big slippery slope.
@redstarfish quote from their policy page
"The libreboot position is more like an opinion, as opposed to an actual policy. That opinion is this: some freedom is better than zero freedom."
Lol what they should just rebrand to libre-ishboot
@vitali64sur@mamot.fr @redstarfish@social.linux.pizza @postmarketOS@fosstodon.org A fork is necessary to get Libreboot to be FSDG compliant again tho.
@SuperDicq @redstarfish No. That isn't necessary. I'm going to send a patch to make lbmk ask the user if they want blobs regardless of the board (proceed at your own risk!), just like what @postmarketOS does.
@redstarfish@social.linux.pizza At least they are still allowing you to build Libreboot without blobs using the "FSDG=" flag.
I think it's stupid to call this option FSDG because the Free System Distribution Guidelines clearly states that "documentation must take care not to recommend nonfree software." which it is clearly doing.
So, what's going to happen now? Do we have to fork Libreboot to make it an official GNU package again?
GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.