A lot of you get on me for thinking everyone is retarded, that almost everything we see is caused by retardation, that our elites are also retarded.
It's not a conspiracy.
Ppl are just dumb, dumber than you know yet.
A lot of you get on me for thinking everyone is retarded, that almost everything we see is caused by retardation, that our elites are also retarded.
It's not a conspiracy.
Ppl are just dumb, dumber than you know yet.
I think affluent ppl are often the most retarded, hold the most delusional beliefs, often demonstrating an almost completely uneducated world view.
They were manufactured this way by the military according to their own writings in the huge domestic efforts after WW2 spanning multiple operations.
It's Y we don't actually have a national policy now, and any efforts toward 1 R met with a hard response.
This wasn't always true in America, but started 2 change drastically 100 yrs ago
United States of Atlantis.
It's so much bigger than the powerless, absent minded, easily manipulated person.
Bernays and Lippmann were in that first wave leading to our first mass media. I think they had to know what they were setting in motion. Our military used to actually write about this before they were purged.
@white_male @djsumdog @jazzilla
So are you advocating that most people have about the same amount of intelligence on average and there are not massive gaps between those who study and were not born with cognitive disabilities and those who either do not try to study or were born with cognitive disabilities
Are you arguing that most people are close to equal
Are you arguing that there is not a massive difference between someone who is smarter than 80% of people and an average person?
@djsumdog @jazzilla
@white_male
It is easier to justify Statist communism if you assume a certain kind of bell curve distribution rather than a certain kind of power distribution for intelligence, strength and other attributes that effect the autonomy and productivity and caoability of people
I suspect that is why the default position in the social sciences is to start with a bell curve assumption and then not test if the data would fit some other curve better followed by a t test or z test
I would suggest that intelligence is probably closer to a power distribution than a bell curve and the implications of this are very important
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_law
If you have a certain kind of bell curve distribution most people tend to be much closer to being equal to one another in terms of intelligence and someone who is smarter than 80% of people will have a much smaller gap of difference between someone who is average than the type of power distribution I suspect
GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.