@vriska@lizards.live I just did. You are a great person with lot of qualities. Not finding a job doesn't make you bad, jobs are difficult to find lately, for everyone.
What DMs? Did people literally create fake DMs that I'm supposed to have sent now? lol
> why bring up gender
Because literally the only reason they tried to spread that rumor is that I expose troon madness like when they assault feminists for disagreeing with them.
@dushman >could grind the economy to a halt and cause the collapse of the govt and corporations
Yeah, but, nobody wants to be homeless or not have food on the table or die from easily curable diseases and shit, either. We live in a society, for better or for worse, and we need the gears of that society to continue functioning for life to continue happening. A collapse of the government and the corporations/economy, evil as these things may be, would also fuck us, the workers and the people. We're still stuck on this boat, hombre. There's no life-rafts for us. If we sink this dreadnought we're going down to the bottom along with it. @vriska@raccoon
@taylan >prostitution [……] a person resorts to due to a lack of alternatives, and it tends to be extremely unhealthy for them. If they genuinely had a choice, they would generally not choose it.
I'm genuinely not sure what I should be apologizing for? She called me a pedophile out of nowhere, because she fell for the lies of stupid aggressive activists who call anyone they don't like a pedophile, so I've poked fun at her.
How would you respond to someone on the Internet you don't even know calling you a pedophile out of nowhere, because they have some kind of political hatred for you? I deal with hateful people by poking fun at them.
Sweatshops and prostitution have something very similar in common, which is that they are things a person resorts to due to a lack of alternatives, and it tends to be extremely unhealthy for them. If they genuinely had a choice, they would generally not choose it.
Also, in both cases, there is a person who's responsible for the misery, who should be held responsible: The sweatshop owner, who could pay the workers proper wages and give them humane working times, breaks, safe working conditions, sick leave, etc.; and the sex buyer, who could simply give the money to the destitute person he's paying, since he evidently doesn't need the money and would have given it away merely for some sexual pleasure i.e. entertainment. Instead chooses to compound the suffering of a destitute person by using his economically dominant position.
It's also empirically observed that places with a lax attitude on prostitution end up being a more popular destination for human trafficking, since it's very difficult to regulate prostitution, meaning the industry gets flooded by organized crime, with even some ostensibly "clean" and legally operating brothels frequently containing lots of trafficked persons and being in cahoots with mafias behind the scenes.
Accusing those who point out these facts as being "opposed to women's agency and ability to make choices" is a tired old trope that middle class academics and pimp lobbyists came up with. It doesn't hold up to scrutiny at all, but sure makes for nice catchy slogans and "gotcha" responses.
@taylan@dushman@raccoon@vriska@adiz man you're retarded. You need to shut up dude. Oh no someone said a slur to me on the Internet maybe tell you're mom how bad the Internet is. Lol
Your individual experience, if it's even real, is not a substitute to the thousands upon thousands of data points we have from across the globe, both sports events and training physiology studies, that confirm significant advantages for males in sports, primarily related to the much higher amounts of testosterone that men's bodies produce.
To deny that is to think the earth is flat. It's the most basic truth that anyone who knows anything about human biology and sports will be able to tell you.
I guarantee you that I have more T than you every hour of the day every day of the month unless you're male, take T, or have a serious endocrine disturbance. I don't think that makes me superior in any way at all, but it's really funny that a woman would insult a man for having low T... (I've never had it tested. Probably in the normal range.)
As I've already pointed out, that's what the mute and block buttons are for. Nobody forces you to read my posts.
You just wish to be able to talk smack about someone and want them to shut up and take it. Fuck right off with that psychopathic shit. If you think that's a reasonable expectation, then it's you who doesn't understand other people and behaves like they're nobodies rather than people.
I always give people a right to response and engage with their arguments first and foremost, instead of attacking their character, even if I use sarcasm.
Of course, I draw the line at people who just start to behave like hateful idiots, like when they do nothing but hurl insults, or try to spread insane rumors, at which point I reserve the right to make fun of them. If you can dish it out, you can also take it.
@taylan Dude, you are not welcome. What can anyone say but blocking you? Do you have any ability to understand others? Do you even understand there are other people?
How many people are there? More than one?
Sorry to all others, i have taken the stage unprompted, but i was a bit miffed there. Sorry.
> you did the same shit with the whole loony troon thing
I've called people "loony troons" who spread rumors about random people being pedophiles for no other reason than the fact that they hate them for political reasons.
Because that's something a lunatic does, and because they're "troons" i.e. trans goons aka "Trans Rights Activists" who really just hate feminists (rather than do anything for trans people) and behave like thugs, fantasizing about stabbing people, and going to feminist events to assault women and then celebrating such assaults on social media.
Me talking about these issues is why they targeted me. That's why I said vriska fell for the lies of loony troons. It wasn't random or out of nowhere; it was related to the origin of the rumor she chose to believe.
> you cried because she called you a faggot
I've poked fun at her for trying to offend me with a homophobic slur, which makes no sense because 1. I don't think there's anything wrong with being gay so why should I be offended, 2. she's a lesbian so, if anything, using the slur would be at her own detriment, but I guess it's a humor thing so whatever.
Please by all means call me a faggot as much as you want. It's honestly the least of my worries. In my mind it simply gets translated to "I hate you" which is unfortunate but not my problem since the root of the hatred is irrational and not something wrong I've done.
@taylan@raccoon@vriska@adiz@admitsWrongIfProven well you did the same shit with the whole loony troon thing. Like why everything has to be trans and people are crazy. Sounds very gay to me. Than you cried because she called you a faggot and what I seen on this thread you act like one