Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Bricky (thatbrickster@shitposter.world)'s status on Tuesday, 22-Apr-2025 18:52:10 JST Bricky

   • :suya:
   @newt
   >Even if you carry some hideous genetic defect, it is usually possible to filter out with IVF.
   Which, depending on who you ask, is eugenics. My point was I am not opposed to it and am open to talking about the various forms people may see it as.
   
   >If anything, I consider aversion to having children a huge character weakness (suffered from it myself).
   Big agree. There are parts of myself I wouldn't want to see reflected in my children.
   • Embed this notice
     dilbert 1 (sun@shitposter.world)'s status on Tuesday, 22-Apr-2025 18:52:09 JST dilbert 1

     in reply to

     • :suya:
     @thatbrickster @newt every social policy of a government or society is eugenic
   • Embed this notice
     ⚡Lord of Misrule⚡ (toiletpaper@shitposter.world)'s status on Tuesday, 22-Apr-2025 20:16:09 JST ⚡Lord of Misrule⚡

     in reply to

     • :suya:
     • dilbert 1
     @sun @thatbrickster @newt
     
     if by "eugenic" you mean putting the most useless and incompetent people in charge of making life difficult for everyone else.
   • Embed this notice
     dilbert 1 (sun@shitposter.world)'s status on Tuesday, 22-Apr-2025 20:16:09 JST dilbert 1

     in reply to

     • :suya:
     • ⚡Lord of Misrule⚡
     @toiletpaper @newt @thatbrickster nah I just mean social policy decides what to promote and what to discourage which is obviously eugenic. I'mm not suggesting its equivalent to blunt "these people should breed and these should not"