@GossiTheDog Hey I'm just telling them what they should do if they want to be competitive or even still viable once this shit melts down.
Their loss if they don't want to listen to me.
See also: my display name.
@GossiTheDog Hey I'm just telling them what they should do if they want to be competitive or even still viable once this shit melts down.
Their loss if they don't want to listen to me.
See also: my display name.
LinkedIn is sadly a really good sense check for where businesses are going.
One thing I’ve noticed lately - people come up with the stupidest ideas possible, and then post long things about how it’s a great idea. They use generative AI to make the posts - generative AI will write posts and documents supporting whatever dumb shit you want.
My feeling - this will transfer inside businesses. People will present long Word documents and PowerPoints proposing absolutely dumb shit, and because everybody in biz is so numb to the process, they’ll nod along to the green tick lists and 57 page Word documents and sign things off which shouldn’t be.
Automating people being able to express dumb ideas at scale with long documents full of errors and made up data will have consequences, basically - as people don’t have the bandwidth to refute infinite bullshit.
IMHO businesses should have a global policy for every employee saying all generative AI content in documents - Word, PowerPoint slides etc - must be clearly labelled as such.
That way when you’re reviewing documents to make decisions, you have an idea around the source.
As an example - did you know that you don’t need a functioning CVE system as Copilot says you can buy magic AI boxes? Everything is automated, job solved. People in cyber are posting this kind of dribble on LinkedIn.
@GossiTheDog I’m not a cybersecurity specialist by any means and I tend to ignore LinkedIn because even before AI it was an unbearable place of self-presentation and bragging about minor things. I see AI as “base”-protection: if used right, even a beginner in cybersecurity can achieve a good protection against well-known threats by prompting and implementing with a bit of common sense. So basically it would free professionals from the basics to focus on more important tasks
It's takes twice as much energy to refute bollocks than it does to create it.
Therefore no-one will want to take the time, energy and other resources to do so.
@GossiTheDog Once a human prompts Copilot to create a doc and then saves it to M365, that now becomes a human authored source. Next time that hallucinated BS will be attributed to a coworker, making it even harder for anyone to spot the error.
I've asked if there is anything built into #Microsoft365 #Copilot to stop this feedback loop of AI hallucinations. No, there isn't.🤷♂️
@mrsaturday @jukkan
Oh, you think Master/ Slave was bad?
Just wait till Copilot starts using Ubermench/filthy_degenerate functions...
@GossiTheDog Businesses should have a global policy for every employee that generative AI content in documents...
...is grounds for immediate dismissal.
@GossiTheDog from experience: this is already happening.
Not only subtly bullshitty stuff about strategy etc, but I’ve even seen a case where technical documentation about features and APIs was generated by chatGPT and copy-pasted.
So with zero factual content, and zero attribution or labelling as “pure fantasy”. Took the team weeks to recover.
People worry about Confidentiality, but the biggest threat of GenAI is to Integrity.
PS: Yes, I like the summary functionality (although I always vet carefully and end up rephrasing most), and as a non-native speaker starting with something generated really helps sometimes.
But for the love of all of our collective history, stop the disinformation pollution.
@avuko @GossiTheDog "People worry about Confidentiality, but the biggest threat of GenAI is to Integrity."
👆 🛎️ 🛎️ 🛎️
@GossiTheDog I've seen kind of the opposite policy at my last employer (fortune 50 company). Every department, every employee needs to use GenAI - the more the better. It's all bullshit top to bottom.
@dalias @GossiTheDog
Cass is so write. I'm predicting my day-rate will more than double in 2 years as companies need #AIExorcism.
I would love to know, just on LinkedIn, how many inappropriate interviews have taken place because of the recruiter and the candidate having only corresponded through AI..
GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.