@raucao > . Our capitalist system is largely based on a competing theory, the “subjective theory of value”, which states that value is defined not by the labor required to provide a product or service, but by market forces, or more concretely by the subjective value negotiated between a buyer and seller. I admit this theory is compelling when applied to some examples, for example when explaining the value of a Pokemon card. When it comes to intellectual property, however, I find it very unsatisfying, given that a laissez-faire free market would presumably evolve a very different approach to intellectual property. As such I think that intellectual property as a concept depends at least a little bit on Marx for its legitimacy, which I find very funny.
@lain@raucao yeah I noticed that. IP came from patents issued by kings right, there's not really a tight ideological theory for its origin except force imo
@lain cringe marx: >as observable in history, fate is determined not by thought, but human condition >production efficiency is the natural outcome of understanding our surroundings, and by its merits contributes to their preservation better than that goal in itself cool marx: >don't copy my book it took effort to write it
@lain@raucao have you ever considered the idea that it should be illegal to pay more than market rate? Consumers should be punished for unoptimal behavior. This would fix the free market.