An FTC commissioner was fired illegally by Trump, read his statement.
#trump #ftc
Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
Erik Jonker (erikjonker@mastodon.social)'s status on Wednesday, 19-Mar-2025 10:58:13 JST Erik Jonker
- clacke likes this.
-
Embed this notice
James 🌈💜 (shaknais@mastodon.social)'s status on Saturday, 22-Mar-2025 18:34:30 JST James 🌈💜
The employee remains fired, because the one who would enforce whether they may return to work or not, is the one who has illegally fired them.
There's a presidential order, that shouldn't be in effect, being enforced.
Like the police chief firing the plumber, but the police chief also being the landowner and stationing security on the perimeter of their rentee's property.
clacke likes this. -
Embed this notice
Cluster Fcku (clusterfcku@mastodon.social)'s status on Saturday, 22-Mar-2025 18:34:31 JST Cluster Fcku
@ErikJonker what does "illegaly fired" mean here? No jurisdiction? No notice? ...?
-
Embed this notice
James 🌈💜 (shaknais@mastodon.social)'s status on Saturday, 22-Mar-2025 18:34:31 JST James 🌈💜
Independent agencies are intentionally created outside of the executive branch. As such, they are not covered by presidential agency. Congress must debate and pass a motion of dismissal, to fire someone.
That's the meaning of "independent".
-
Embed this notice
Cluster Fcku (clusterfcku@mastodon.social)'s status on Saturday, 22-Mar-2025 18:34:31 JST Cluster Fcku
@shaknais @ErikJonker thanks, so in this case the executive had no authority, right? Isn't it that the employee is simply not fired. (I appreciate that the phrase "illegally fired" is used because people sort of get what it is about.) Perhaps comparable to the police telling me I'm fired, although I work for a plumber. I'm trying to understand how this legally works out. An illegal firing to me is when there is no cause, or the employer violates the employment contract/law. No?
-
Embed this notice
clacke (clacke@libranet.de)'s status on Saturday, 22-Mar-2025 18:34:41 JST clacke
@clusterfcku @ErikJonker It means that the executive branch is breaking laws left and right, which regulate what the executive is allowed to do. When the courts order them to follow the law, they ignore court orders.
They make social media posts engaging in legal fiction about how the judicial branch is not allowed to interpret law and is not allowed to "interfere" with the executive. It's a completely unique event in this century and the century before it. It's a constitutional crisis and a breakdown of the rule of law.