Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 19-Mar-2025 01:28:56 JST Bread up, Bro
   OH MAN
   • Embed this notice
     Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 19-Mar-2025 01:33:58 JST Bread up, Bro

     in reply to

     • JoshuaSlocum
     @JoshuaSlocum the appropriate response is obvious going "OH SHUCKS, GUESS WE NEED TO FIND SOMETHING ELSE TO DO!"
   • Embed this notice
     JoshuaSlocum (joshuaslocum@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 19-Mar-2025 01:33:59 JST JoshuaSlocum

     in reply to
     @sickburnbro if we assume the question that they are rogue judges, and if impeachment is not the appropriate response, then what is?
   • Embed this notice
     Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 19-Mar-2025 01:35:12 JST Bread up, Bro

     in reply to

     • JoshuaSlocum
     @JoshuaSlocum If you can't impeach, fucking roberts won't stop them, and ignoring them is naughty the implication is simply "they run the country, so you have find some a special trick that they somehow can't say no to [ by the way, this is impossible ] "
   • Embed this notice
     Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 19-Mar-2025 01:35:57 JST Bread up, Bro

     in reply to

     • JoshuaSlocum
     @JoshuaSlocum the assumption is that they have some kind of actual moral legalism code they hold to that is actually the most importantest type of ruling and if you catch them in a trick of that, you win
   • Embed this notice
     CrustyB (crustyburgerhead@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Wednesday, 19-Mar-2025 01:45:22 JST CrustyB

     in reply to
     "Foxes are fit to watch henhouse," says fox.
     Bread up, Bro likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 19-Mar-2025 01:58:58 JST Bread up, Bro

     in reply to

     • RaHoWaJoe
     @RaHoWaJoe unless he's saying it as a part of an opinion it doesn't count. This doesn't appear to be that
   • Embed this notice
     RaHoWaJoe (rahowajoe@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 19-Mar-2025 01:58:59 JST RaHoWaJoe

     in reply to
     @sickburnbro Looks like I failed hard on the poll.
   • Embed this notice
     RaHoWaJoe (rahowajoe@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 19-Mar-2025 02:03:37 JST RaHoWaJoe

     in reply to
     @sickburnbro In this case, even him just saying that means I lost
     Bread up, Bro likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 19-Mar-2025 02:05:00 JST Bread up, Bro

     in reply to

     • RaHoWaJoe
     @RaHoWaJoe sure, I mean you can take it anyway you want. when I conceived the question it was in response to an actual action happening - unless they actually hear it in court, it remains (3) in my view.
   • Embed this notice
     Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 19-Mar-2025 02:06:55 JST Bread up, Bro

     in reply to

     • Boina Roja Enthusiast Karl Dahl
     @KarlDahl worse than not crossing the rubicon is getting half way then complaining your feet are cold
   • Embed this notice
     Boina Roja Enthusiast Karl Dahl (karldahl@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 19-Mar-2025 02:06:56 JST Boina Roja Enthusiast Karl Dahl

     in reply to
     @sickburnbro You'd think that they could just have someone do the needful