Niggas will be like “I could never be given a footjob” without realizing it’s a handjob except you get a view of a cute girl lying on her back with her legs spread
Sex when she’s not fertile (5 days of the month usually) is sex without even a chance of procreation, and if that’s not allowed then 1 Cor 7 would not say “defraud ye not one another”
The entire point of 1 Cor 7 is “if you want to marry, marry someone of the opposite sex and make her/him cum frequently so you’re not tempted by adultery”
@d0c40r0@tyler@BowsacNoodle@MisterLister i been doing a lot of networking stuff setting up servers and forwarding ports for subnetworks so that i could play video games on a laptop 20 ft away from my house without installing them on the laaptop
@d0c40r0@tyler@BowsacNoodle@MisterLister what if i told you i think all sex outside of vaginal is degenerate, you'd immediately say some retarded shit, and i'd have to burn you at a stake.
I would also tell you that that logic comes from “all stimulation should equal a child” which is statistically improbable if you’re not tracking her cycle and also contrary to 1 Cor 7 where it states you should not defraud one another except for during agreed upon times of abstaining and that the body of the wife belongs to the husband and the husband to the wife
Zealist thinks footjobs between a man and wife are unbiblical, I said that logic comes from “all sex should equal procreation” which goes against 1 Cor 7
good one nigga “instead of countering a Biblical argument with Biblical evidence I’m going to claim he’s weak in faith cus he’s okay with something I’m not and have no actual evidence to dispute”
if God wanted all stimulation to equal sex the Bible wouldn’t say to freely give up your body to your spouse, it would say “only have sex when she’s fertile”
@reallyangry@d0c40r0@tyler@BowsacNoodle And you have a real bad habit of jumping into threads and saying unrelated shit in attempt to high jack it because nobody cares about your fucking chickens when you post it on your own you fucking sperg
@d0c40r0@tyler@BowsacNoodle@MisterLister you've added words to my mouth that i never said there's a difference between having intercourse with your wife and getting a foot job from her, you'll find i never once even implied non procreative sex was degenerate, sexual fetish shit like feet and armpits blow jobs and handjobs are degenerate.
@d0c40r0@tyler@BowsacNoodle@MisterLister you've got a real bad habit of taking and twisting up someone's words to mean things they never said then running with it.
@reallyangry@tyler@MisterLister There is a distinct difference between a fetish and an enjoyment of the loving touch of your spouse. The Roman Catholic Church has writings on this in painful detail (because of course they do), such as Humanae Vitae. A husband and wife ought to be having proper sex. That is not always an option at all times. >Sodomy Sorry @d0c40r0 but you're wrong on this one... sodomy is defined as oral or anal sex. I looked up the etymology and the key thing from tradition is that it generally related to same sex or beastiality, although KJV uses it as a general term for whore (sodomitesse). Getting a BJ from your wife ≠ anal sex or beastiality, but it is a non procreative sexual act. Handles and foot jobs wouldn't necessarily fall under sodomy by this definition.
Idk why egghead niggas feel the need to enumerate and regulate things beyond their domain.
Marriage is honorable in all and the bed is undefiled, but whormongers and adulterers God will judge.
I can do whatever I want with my wife. We are married. It's inappropriate for a church or government to try to control that, or to attempt to label anything a man and wife do as sodomy. That's a man's adoption of a biblical definition, not what the Bible's is. Sodomy is doing what the sodomites did, which was everything in lev 20.
In Romans 1 it was also explained as "leaving the natural use of the woman", which is an extreme difference and couldn't be farther in spirit from a saved husband and wife enjoying their liberty, whether or not it's profitable or expedient unto them.
@tyler@d0c40r0@MisterLister@reallyangry >Idk why egghead niggas feel the need to enumerate and regulate things beyond their domain. People ask questions and split hairs instead of just trying to serve and love God. I guess if your conscious is bothered by something then we're back to Paul's advice to not do it.
>I can do whatever I want with my wife. We are married. It's inappropriate for a church or government to try to control that, or to attempt to label anything a man and wife do as sodomy. It's not my place to say, but I do think the libertine attitudes about what people do behind closed doors has been a contributing factor to the slide down the slippery slope of degeneracy. There's possibly a spiritual aspect to that as well, but I'm neither trying to split hairs nor claim I'm innocent. I largely agree with you, but I think the attempts to curtail potentially inappropriate behavior aren't a bad thing.