Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Pawslut420 (sendpaws@mitra.pawslut.party)'s status on Thursday, 06-Feb-2025 04:22:16 JST Pawslut420

   Updated to the new husky version and wow it passes longer character limits now

   • Embed this notice
     silverpill (silverpill@mitra.social)'s status on Thursday, 06-Feb-2025 04:22:12 JST silverpill

     in reply to

     • Koi

     @sendpaws @koimoa Mitra has federation filter, which works like Pleroma MRF:

     https://codeberg.org/silverpill/mitra/src/branch/main/docs/filter.md

     It is much less flexible (can't run arbitrary code), but filter rules are stored in database, and can be edited with CLI (and hopefully via Admin Web UI in the future).

     >keyword filtering

     I don't think we have that. But if you need this (or some other) moderation capability, let me know.

   • Embed this notice
     Pawslut420 (sendpaws@mitra.pawslut.party)'s status on Thursday, 06-Feb-2025 04:22:13 JST Pawslut420

     in reply to

     • silverpill
     • Koi

     @koimoa RAM usage is really low (maybe 200 at most rn), it has very very basic MRFs (blocking instances and keyword filtering), relays do work
     cc @silverpill

   • Embed this notice
     Pawslut420 (sendpaws@mitra.pawslut.party)'s status on Thursday, 06-Feb-2025 04:22:14 JST Pawslut420

     in reply to

     • Koi

     @koimoa it's running fast as fuck today for sure, only like 38 servers running but the devs active here on fedi

   • Embed this notice
     Koi (koimoa@binky.fish)'s status on Thursday, 06-Feb-2025 04:22:14 JST Koi

     in reply to

     @sendpaws what about moderation features like MRF? Can you use relays? RAM Usage? I'm thinking of starting up one

   • Embed this notice
     Koi (koimoa@binky.fish)'s status on Thursday, 06-Feb-2025 04:22:15 JST Koi

     in reply to

     @sendpaws how is mitra compared to Pleroma

   • Embed this notice
     silverpill (silverpill@mitra.social)'s status on Thursday, 06-Feb-2025 06:01:32 JST silverpill

     in reply to

     • Koi

     @koimoa @sendpaws Not using Zot, but I figured out how to achieve nomadic identity with ActivityPub alone. This nomadic ActivityPub flavor is described in FEP-ef61.
     Mitra supports it, but the implementation is incomplete and not practical for everyday use. I plan to finish it someday, but it will require a lot of work. However, Mike Macgirvin (who created Zot) implemented FEP-ef61 in his project Streams, and his implementation is more complete than mine.

   • Embed this notice
     Koi (koimoa@binky.fish)'s status on Thursday, 06-Feb-2025 06:01:33 JST Koi

     in reply to

     • silverpill

     @silverpill @sendpaws Nice. I was doing some reading, and I saw that you brought up nomadic identity.l so I was wondering if you were using zot

   • Embed this notice
     silverpill (silverpill@mitra.social)'s status on Thursday, 06-Feb-2025 06:22:18 JST silverpill

     in reply to

     • Koi
     • Chris Brooking

     @chris108 @sendpaws @koimoa Yes, I think you are right.

     Internally, they are checked in order: from less specific to more specific. This means wildcards go first, and I had that in mind when I was writing the doc. But from the end user's perspective, the order is reversed.

   • Embed this notice
     Chris Brooking (chris108@wizard.casa)'s status on Thursday, 06-Feb-2025 06:22:19 JST Chris Brooking

     in reply to

     • silverpill
     • Koi

     @silverpill @sendpaws @koimoa

     I have just read the documentation. I think I am misunderstanding something as the section in the attached screenshot says "wildcard rules are applied first", but it is followed by an example that would never accept anything if that were the case. Should it be "wildcard rules are applied last"?

   • Embed this notice
     silverpill (silverpill@mitra.social)'s status on Friday, 07-Feb-2025 04:08:40 JST silverpill

     in reply to

     • Koi
     • Chris Brooking

     @chris108 @sendpaws @koimoa What I am planning to do:

     - Change the phrase to "Wildcard rules are applied last".
     - Reverse the order of rules in list-filter-rules output:

     accept server1.example accept server2.example reject *

     Would that make it easier to understand?

   • Embed this notice
     silverpill (silverpill@mitra.social)'s status on Friday, 14-Feb-2025 04:43:49 JST silverpill

     in reply to

     • Chris Brooking

     @chris108 I changed the order of filter rules in version 3.17.0

   • Embed this notice
     Chris Brooking (chris108@wizard.casa)'s status on Friday, 14-Feb-2025 04:43:50 JST Chris Brooking

     in reply to

     • silverpill
     • Koi

     @silverpill @sendpaws @koimoa

     Yes that's much easier. Thanks.