@feld lol I was just looking for what I had posted about DC to remember why I was so annoyed with it last year, and I just saw your reply.
I am probably still annoyed with how easy it is to shoot yourself in the foot if you use your existing email provider, like I imagine many people would like to do, (and which is why I was happy when Signal removed SMS support) but I'll check it out again with Chatmail this time 👀
@jonah please please do. I don't know if it was my prodding or not, but it now makes it quite difficult to use a normal email address. It pushes you towards an anonymous chatmail account.
like I said in the forum, they're doing some really cool stuff. It's not officially on the roadmap but they've mentioned they can make clients automatically register new anonymous Chatmail accounts across all the public Chatmail servers and rotate between them. So your account/address is disposable and you're a moving target. All your chats will keep working transparently though because of their AEAP implementation. (automatic email address porting)
Well, your phone number isn't a hint about who you are? But that's not what I'm talking about.
They could backdoor clients in ways that only target specific individuals. There are a lot of different attacks they could do as they fully control the software and don't even support reproducible builds on iOS (difficult to do and prove, but not impossible. Requires a rooted/jailbroken phone to prove but it can be done. Telegram has a guide.)
Ignoring the security perspective, they're gonna need a funding model that scales to a billion users. They don't have one. How happy are people gonna be when they have to pay for Signal?
@sun@Nimbius666 he should be a forefront figure for the org and actively engaged with the users and community, spend more time explaining how and why they do things the way they do, actually respond to criticism, better explain what he's done to mitigate the epic fail that is Intel's SGX, etc