Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Foone🏳️‍⚧️ (foone@digipres.club)'s status on Sunday, 26-Jan-2025 11:07:15 JST Foone🏳️‍⚧️

   doing some ICQ research and I found that LICQ's homepage is still online, with zero hint that it hasn't been updated in 11 years:

   http://licq.org/

   • Rainha Das 6 Da Tarde :Ryyca: repeated this.
   • Embed this notice
     Foone🏳️‍⚧️ (foone@digipres.club)'s status on Sunday, 26-Jan-2025 11:07:09 JST Foone🏳️‍⚧️

     in reply to

     a senior project about v5, which has some info:
     http://www.carfield.com.hk/document/networking/icq_protocol.html

   • Embed this notice
     Foone🏳️‍⚧️ (foone@digipres.club)'s status on Sunday, 26-Jan-2025 11:07:10 JST Foone🏳️‍⚧️

     in reply to

     apparently v3 never was really used, so the important versions are v2, v4, and v5.

     I think that ICQ 99a/b used v4, ICQ 2000 used v5, and previous less common versions used v2/v1.

   • Embed this notice
     Foone🏳️‍⚧️ (foone@digipres.club)'s status on Sunday, 26-Jan-2025 11:07:10 JST Foone🏳️‍⚧️

     in reply to

     and here's a compilation of icq-devel mailing posts about the v4 protocol:

     https://web.archive.org/web/20010208232145/http://www.d.kth.se/~d95-mih/icq/spec/v4/v4-notes.txt

   • Embed this notice
     Foone🏳️‍⚧️ (foone@digipres.club)'s status on Sunday, 26-Jan-2025 11:07:11 JST Foone🏳️‍⚧️

     in reply to

     and the v2 spec is here: https://web.archive.org/web/20010126060900/http://www.d.kth.se/~d95-mih/icq/spec/v2/icq091.txt

     Rainha Das 6 Da Tarde :Ryyca: repeated this.
   • Embed this notice
     Foone🏳️‍⚧️ (foone@digipres.club)'s status on Sunday, 26-Jan-2025 11:07:12 JST Foone🏳️‍⚧️

     in reply to

     got as many pages from there as I could (one is missing, the chat one), and got this for v5 info:

     https://web.archive.org/web/20010108011900/http://www.algonet.se/~henisak/icq/icqv5.html

   • Embed this notice
     Foone🏳️‍⚧️ (foone@digipres.club)'s status on Sunday, 26-Jan-2025 11:07:13 JST Foone🏳️‍⚧️

     in reply to

     okay this page has documentation of the v4 protocol:

     https://web.archive.org/web/19991005224713/http://www.globalserve.net/%7Ejphowe/icq/

   • Embed this notice
     Foone🏳️‍⚧️ (foone@digipres.club)'s status on Sunday, 26-Jan-2025 11:07:13 JST Foone🏳️‍⚧️

     in reply to

     HOWEVER they used frames and an imagemap for navigation, and the internet archive didn't get the image. which makes navigating it a bit of a pain

   • Embed this notice
     Foone🏳️‍⚧️ (foone@digipres.club)'s status on Sunday, 26-Jan-2025 11:07:14 JST Foone🏳️‍⚧️

     in reply to

     I found someone who said they wrote a server in perl and it's open source and if anyone wants it they can just ask

     https://lists.wireshark.org/archives/ethereal-users/200008/msg00168.html

     that post is 25 years old, do you think that offer is still good?

     Rainha Das 6 Da Tarde :Ryyca: repeated this.
   • Embed this notice
     Fish of Rage (sun@shitposter.world)'s status on Sunday, 26-Jan-2025 11:07:32 JST Fish of Rage

     in reply to
     @foone it used a centralized server for identity and finding clients and then established a direct p2p connection between clients (that could be trivially spoofed)
     Jeff "never puts away anything, especially oven mitts" Cliff, Bringer of Nightmares 🏴‍☠️🦝🐙 🇱🇧🧯 🇨🇦🐧 likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     Foone🏳️‍⚧️ (foone@digipres.club)'s status on Sunday, 26-Jan-2025 11:07:33 JST Foone🏳️‍⚧️

     in reply to

     fun fact about this era of the ICQ protocol: It's apparently entirely UDP based, and I think it does UDP directly between users as well, rather than the server.

     In other words, it's exactly the kind of internet program that only made sense in 1996-1999 before NAT was a widespread thing

   • Embed this notice
     Foone🏳️‍⚧️ (foone@digipres.club)'s status on Sunday, 26-Jan-2025 11:07:34 JST Foone🏳️‍⚧️

     in reply to

     well ICQ99 seems to work on windows 10, so that's good. Sadly I can't register my ICQ number.

     Rainha Das 6 Da Tarde :Ryyca: repeated this.
   • Embed this notice
     feld (feld@friedcheese.us)'s status on Sunday, 26-Jan-2025 11:09:47 JST feld

     in reply to

     • Fish of Rage
     @sun @foone When did ICQ and AIM end up being the same protocol? (OSCAR)
   • Embed this notice
     Fish of Rage (sun@shitposter.world)'s status on Sunday, 26-Jan-2025 11:12:10 JST Fish of Rage

     in reply to

     • feld
     @feld @foone I don't know but I bet it was when they wanted to add encryption
   • Embed this notice
     Foone🏳️‍⚧️ (foone@digipres.club)'s status on Sunday, 26-Jan-2025 22:53:35 JST Foone🏳️‍⚧️

     in reply to

     okay, my client is just sending the command CMD_NEW_USER_1 over and over, which is a "ask for permission to make a new user" command. I don't know what the reply is supposed to be

     Rainha Das 6 Da Tarde :Ryyca: repeated this.
   • Embed this notice
     Foone🏳️‍⚧️ (foone@digipres.club)'s status on Sunday, 26-Jan-2025 22:53:35 JST Foone🏳️‍⚧️

     in reply to

     my code doesn't work yet, but I did find where it's implemented in wireshark, and there's some Suspicious offset checks:

     https://github.com/giuliano108/wireshark-rtpmon/blob/master/epan/dissectors/packet-icq.c#L428

   • Embed this notice
     Foone🏳️‍⚧️ (foone@digipres.club)'s status on Sunday, 26-Jan-2025 22:53:36 JST Foone🏳️‍⚧️

     in reply to

     wait! Wireshark DOES support ICQ, it just didn't detect it in this case. Awesome

   • Embed this notice
     Foone🏳️‍⚧️ (foone@digipres.club)'s status on Sunday, 26-Jan-2025 22:53:37 JST Foone🏳️‍⚧️

     in reply to

     how is this decryption supposed to work if it starts at offset 10 and then does it in 4-byte chunks but the packet is 28 bytes long?

   • Embed this notice
     Foone🏳️‍⚧️ (foone@digipres.club)'s status on Sunday, 26-Jan-2025 22:53:37 JST Foone🏳️‍⚧️

     in reply to

     maybe I just need to pad all packets and they forgot to mention that

   • Embed this notice
     Foone🏳️‍⚧️ (foone@digipres.club)'s status on Sunday, 26-Jan-2025 22:53:38 JST Foone🏳️‍⚧️

     in reply to

     I'm gonna write python code to decode a packet from these docs and then I'll convert that to lua. writing it in lua the first time will be too painful, when I don't fully understand how this nonsense works

   • Embed this notice
     Foone🏳️‍⚧️ (foone@digipres.club)'s status on Sunday, 26-Jan-2025 22:53:39 JST Foone🏳️‍⚧️

     in reply to

     oh I can write lua (eww, for low level binary stuff?) dissectors. that'll make this slightly easier

     Rainha Das 6 Da Tarde :Ryyca: repeated this.
   • Embed this notice
     Foone🏳️‍⚧️ (foone@digipres.club)'s status on Sunday, 26-Jan-2025 22:53:40 JST Foone🏳️‍⚧️

     in reply to

     packets are encrypted which is a Pain.the encryption is trivially breakable but it means I can't use wireshark to see the packet contents.

     unless I add support to wireshark, which sounds like A Project in itself

   • Embed this notice
     Foone🏳️‍⚧️ (foone@digipres.club)'s status on Sunday, 26-Jan-2025 22:53:41 JST Foone🏳️‍⚧️

     in reply to

     hmm, I'm using ICQ 99b and it seems to be sending version 5 packets? interesting

   • Embed this notice
     Foone🏳️‍⚧️ (foone@digipres.club)'s status on Sunday, 26-Jan-2025 22:53:42 JST Foone🏳️‍⚧️

     in reply to

     a computer needs a hex editor, packet capture, Good text editor, SSH client, ghidra or ida, decompilers for C# and java, C compiler, pythons (2 and 3), binxelview, Dependencies viewer, DOSBox, UNP, at least one unity unpacker, debugger, relative-searcher, yychr, and emulators for at least 12 consoles & home computers.

     otherwise it's just a toy, like a Nintendo.

   • Embed this notice
     Foone🏳️‍⚧️ (foone@digipres.club)'s status on Sunday, 26-Jan-2025 22:53:43 JST Foone🏳️‍⚧️

     in reply to

     their were proxies almost immediately, which used a local program that talked over HTTP to a remote server that then did UDP to the target (or their proxy) because any NAT, firewall, or proxy situation completely broke this

   • Embed this notice
     Foone🏳️‍⚧️ (foone@digipres.club)'s status on Sunday, 26-Jan-2025 22:53:43 JST Foone🏳️‍⚧️

     in reply to

     why doesn't my "gaming laptop" have wireshark already installed. this system is barely usable

     Rainha Das 6 Da Tarde :Ryyca: repeated this.
   • Embed this notice
     Ryan Finnie (foo@fosstodon.org)'s status on Sunday, 26-Jan-2025 22:55:28 JST Ryan Finnie

     in reply to

     @foone If it helps for reference, I once wrote a Wireshark lua dissector for 2ping, a low-level UDP binary protocol. Though as a warning, I haven't looked at it in about a decade, so it may not even work anymore.
     https://github.com/rfinnie/2ping/tree/main/wireshark

   • Embed this notice
     emily, blinkenlight witch (emily@sparkly.uni.horse)'s status on Sunday, 26-Jan-2025 22:55:59 JST emily, blinkenlight witch

     in reply to

     @foone sudden desire to get a bunch of people who are neither gamers nor computer people, and have them guess if things like "wireshark" or "fortnite" are the names of video games or nerd tools

     throw "rust" in there as a trick question too