I'm having some sort of federation issue, for some servers [like mas.to, mastodon.social, mastodon.online or cyberplace.social], I get `"https://mas.to/inbox returned code 401"` in my logs if I toot or try to follow someone. Other servers are still fine with my server.
In env, I have
LOCAL_DOMAIN=kurumah.dev
WEB_DOMAIN=mastodon.kurumah.dev
I think the webfinger is fine.
I guess if you see this toot that means your server is also fine with mine.
Does anyone have any clue what it could be?
The current outage of archive.org's services shows us once again that the only centralized storage and provision of music by just one major provider is fragile. This also affects clongclongmoo. For example, all MouseMixes have disappeared until further notice. I think we need to think in a more decentralized way. Perhaps it would be a solution to at least store the current releases on a “dedicated” server.
In the meantime, all good @internetarchive Get back on your feet soon!
(…) on a personal website), which in turn enables service providers to offer their users a “BYO (Bring Your Own) domain name” feature.
That’s really all I ever needed from the notion of a ‘single-user instance’. All I want to manage on my own is my identity, not a full AP server.
In this paradigm, someone’s tiny personal website could also be their Actor-ID Provider, and nothing more. That ID could in turn be used to as a (reasonably nomadic) account on any FEP-7952 compatible instance.
One thing that I don't understand is why do some servers want to block meta. For me it's like if Firefox blocked some websites because Mozilla didn't like the rules.
From what I understand, the fediverse was meant to be open for anyone to create a server.
In the end, it's just more people that you can speak to from any platform. And some people will even change to another server if they see one that allows something that threads doesn't.
#meta #fediverse #threads #fedipact
>What should a server do if the object of the Follow Activity is already in the followers collection?
This could happen due to bad connectivity. So the correct action here is to send Accept again to ensure it is processed by the other server.
In general, activities should be idempotent.
>Now the worst case question: Consider two Follow activities having been send by Bob. Then Bob sends an Undo Follow for one of them. Question: Should Bob be removed from the followers collection?
Depends on the order in which they are received. If Undo is the last one, then Bob should be removed from followers.
I'm guessing it's confused by the peer to peer system.
PeerTube allows small servers to reach big audiences by using p2p. This means if you're watching and lots of other people are watching the same video, you pass bits of the video to each other to take the strain off the server.
In theory you might be able to see the IP address of somemone who is watching it at the same time as you, but in practice this is kind of tricky and you're not going to know who they are anyway.
GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.