Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 23-Jan-2025 06:35:13 JST Bread up, Bro
   this, I think is important to follow - it will set the standard for if renaming DEI to something dumb will make it "ok"
   • BowserNoodle ☦️ likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     NoDoxGregBrady (nodoxgregbrady@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 23-Jan-2025 06:37:28 JST NoDoxGregBrady

     in reply to
     @sickburnbro That AP brief included the text at the end that if they were changing names to circumvent the intention, the penalties and punishments would be bad.
     Bread up, Bro and AlabasterBrick ?‍☠️ like this.
   • Embed this notice
     Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 23-Jan-2025 06:38:46 JST Bread up, Bro

     in reply to

     • NoDoxGregBrady
     @NoDoxGregBrady yeah, again everyone is used to republicans SAYING they are gonna do things, and then "woops" nothing happens.
     
     On the positive side, if Trump keeps following through on shit it's gonna be like a nonstop loony tunes show
     AlabasterBrick ?‍☠️ likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 23-Jan-2025 06:52:49 JST Bread up, Bro

     in reply to

     • ElJewpacabra
     @Jewpacabra it's a bit silly, but GOA is legit.
     gunowners.org/
   • Embed this notice
     ElJewpacabra (jewpacabra@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 23-Jan-2025 06:52:50 JST ElJewpacabra

     in reply to
     @sickburnbro “Gun Owners of America” sounds like a faggot.
   • Embed this notice
     WilhelmIII (wilhelmiii@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Thursday, 23-Jan-2025 06:54:46 JST WilhelmIII

     in reply to

     • ElJewpacabra

     They've been part of some of the biggest pro-gun judicial rulings.

     I split my donations between SAF, GOA and FPC.

     Bread up, Bro likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     john_darksoul (john_darksoul@pl.firelink.digital)'s status on Thursday, 23-Jan-2025 12:32:48 JST john_darksoul

     in reply to
     @sickburnbro Don’t ask, don’t tell worked in the military. Don’t ask why we’re not hiring Whites don’t tell anyone we’re not hiring Whites. At the end of the day it can’t be stopped without mandatory quotas for Whites. This is why explicitly pro-White politics is necessary.
   • Embed this notice
     Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 23-Jan-2025 12:32:48 JST Bread up, Bro

     in reply to

     • john_darksoul
     @john_darksoul there should be no need for a quota for whites, we aren't some kind of ridiculous minority.
     
     Doing things like cancelling the 50 year old affirmative action EO is the biggest bang for the buck - once there is no legal justification for discrimination against whites, it becomes politically dangerous to do so - and the majority of these big companies doing stuff like that will stop simply because the risk is too high.
     
     The little companies have either not done it at all because they don't have HR or have gone the "all illegals" route, and those will resolve themselves.
   • Embed this notice
     Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 23-Jan-2025 12:37:51 JST Bread up, Bro

     in reply to

     • Mancow Muller ?
     @cowanon it's such an obvious play. The best part is, if people really demand change, it's proof positive of evil intent.
   • Embed this notice
     Mancow Muller ? (cowanon@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Thursday, 23-Jan-2025 12:37:52 JST Mancow Muller ?

     in reply to
     Renaming and rebranding while sticking to the anti-white script has been their game plan this whole time.
   • Embed this notice
     Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 23-Jan-2025 12:39:32 JST Bread up, Bro

     in reply to

     • john_darksoul
     @john_darksoul yes. lawsuits is what would change things. It is hard to explain how antiwhite the system has been, but a simple example is: the ivies lawsuit that was taken to the SCOTUS had to use asians because discriminating against whites was allowed.
     ?? Humpleupagus ?? likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     john_darksoul (john_darksoul@pl.firelink.digital)'s status on Thursday, 23-Jan-2025 12:39:33 JST john_darksoul

     in reply to
     @sickburnbro I have my doubts that it will stop being practiced. HR departments have their biases and they aren't going away overnight. There is a potential for lawsuits, which could resolve the issue, but that takes time as well. We should be able to check employment numbers a year for now to see if there's a discernible correction.
   • Embed this notice
     ?? Humpleupagus ?? (humpleupagus@eveningzoo.club)'s status on Thursday, 23-Jan-2025 12:41:27 JST ?? Humpleupagus ??

     in reply to

     • john_darksoul
     What he needs to do is prohibit states from giving preference to women and minorities in public contracts. It's not even convert in California. It's literally law.
     Bread up, Bro likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 23-Jan-2025 12:54:34 JST Bread up, Bro

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • john_darksoul
     @Humpleupagus @john_darksoul removing the EO takes away a lot of the back stop for things. When the federal government doesn't do something it provides a much better ground to challenge this.
     
     The question is: if you wanted to sue a state for discrimination, where would you do this? I would think that a state court wouldn't be the appropriate venue.