Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   SuperDicq (superdicq@minidisc.tokyo)'s status on Friday, 17-Jan-2025 23:55:36 JST SuperDicq

   • :suya:
   • Adolph
   • 𝅙𝅙𝅙𝅙𝅙𝅙𝅙𝅙
   • Christmas Sun
   • david :_biflag:

   @meowski@fluf.club @newt@stereophonic.space @captainepoch@stereophonic.space @sally@freesoftwareextremist.com @sun@shitposter.world @david@pl.dav1d.lol It's free software, you can just fork it and make your cringe right wing based and redpilled edition if it becomes too "woke" for you.

   • Embed this notice
     SuperDicq (superdicq@minidisc.tokyo)'s status on Saturday, 18-Jan-2025 00:33:53 JST SuperDicq

     in reply to

     • :suya:
     • Adolph
     • SataNEET Panic
     • 𝅙𝅙𝅙𝅙𝅙𝅙𝅙𝅙
     • Christmas Sun
     • david :_biflag:

     @EmoIsDeadAndSoAmI@mastodon.bv.linksjugend-solid.de @newt@stereophonic.space @captainepoch@stereophonic.space @sally@freesoftwareextremist.com @sun@shitposter.world @david@pl.dav1d.lol like Tusky banning certain fedi servers client-sideYes and precisely because it is free you can just remove the anti-feature. It's very trivial to do.

   • Embed this notice
     SataNEET Panic (emoisdeadandsoami@mastodon.bv.linksjugend-solid.de)'s status on Saturday, 18-Jan-2025 00:33:54 JST SataNEET Panic

     in reply to

     • :suya:
     • Adolph
     • 𝅙𝅙𝅙𝅙𝅙𝅙𝅙𝅙
     • Christmas Sun
     • david :_biflag:

     @SuperDicq @newt @captainepoch @sally @sun @david
     I have seen conflicts in free software where people moved away from free software orthodoxy to include anti-features and similar anti-freedoms in software (like Tusky banning certain fedi servers client-side). They can do that, but offering the software under free software licenses is a misappropriation of them. I would say this is the red line where politically inclined programmers should stop and think. This is a problem for the movement