I dislike git blame. It's hostile. It assume there is someone to blame. That someone did something wrong. That someone is at fault.
Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
Ron Gilbert, Esq. (grumpygamer@mastodon.gamedev.place)'s status on Friday, 10-Jan-2025 21:51:56 JST Ron Gilbert, Esq.
-
Embed this notice
The Seven Voyages Of Steve (sinbad@mastodon.gamedev.place)'s status on Friday, 10-Jan-2025 21:51:55 JST The Seven Voyages Of Steve
@grumpygamer They added "git annotate" later because of this, but "git blame" remains so as not to break old scripts
-
Embed this notice
Juan (reidrac@mastodon.gamedev.place)'s status on Friday, 10-Jan-2025 22:08:10 JST Juan
@sinbad @grumpygamer when I really got into git I think both were available already? I can't remember, but I write blame because old habits and is shorter and... I don't judge people (very often I find it was *me* anyway).
-
Embed this notice
David (idbrii@mastodon.gamedev.place)'s status on Saturday, 11-Jan-2025 01:33:02 JST David
@reidrac @sinbad
Apparently annotate was first and blame was a different competing implementations:
https://git.vger.kernel.narkive.com/XgwB2lTo/blame-vs-annotate#post4I'm not that familiar with git dev history, so I wonder if many of their features had rivals until one won and eliminated the other!
-
Embed this notice
The Seven Voyages Of Steve (sinbad@mastodon.gamedev.place)'s status on Saturday, 11-Jan-2025 01:33:32 JST The Seven Voyages Of Steve
@idbrii @reidrac huh, I always thought it was the other way around
-
Embed this notice