GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPは日本のGNU socialサーバーです。
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. Embed this notice
    Robin Rendle (fonts@sfba.social)'s status on Saturday, 04-Jan-2025 17:19:25 JST Robin Rendle Robin Rendle

    One thing that drives me *bonkers* about tech culture is teaching designers that the bureaucracy is more important than the output — journey maps, documentation, multiple iterations, user research etc etc. All of these are fine tools but the goal is a good product and you can spend months producing mountains of all these design artifacts and *still* end up with junk.

    In conversation about 4 months ago from sfba.social permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Joachim (joachim@boitam.eu)'s status on Saturday, 04-Jan-2025 17:34:00 JST Joachim Joachim
      in reply to
      • Sara Joy :happy_pepper:

      @sarajw @fonts in my mind, the production of these artifacts is a way for the designer to justify their result. Not necessarily a post-hoc rationalization (though I’ve seen it happen, designers skewing the research in order to justify their own preconceptions), but more a diffusion of responsibility. You’re right that design teams have a lot of pressure from every other team, every manager, etc. So everyone has an opinion but very few people have the knowledge and experience of design that designers have. It can be very frustrating for a designer to propose a solution only to have it shot down with spurious reasons and bad ideas.
      So UX design kind of saved the day, with an industrialized way of reaching design decisions. Sometimes complicating things in order to appear serious and your decisions to appear grounded in an approach that business-types and technical-types. No more of this “creativity” and “sensitivity” nonsense.

      In conversation about 4 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Sara Joy :happy_pepper: (sarajw@front-end.social)'s status on Saturday, 04-Jan-2025 17:34:01 JST Sara Joy :happy_pepper: Sara Joy :happy_pepper:
      in reply to

      @fonts are UX and design becoming, or did they become the same thing? Are they the same? Should they be?

      Please assume I'm ignorant, not that I'm asking probing questions.

      Part of the problem I feel is that everyone, because everyone interacts directly with the design, feels like they have a stake in it, have ideas about how it should be, has an *opinion*.

      In conversation about 4 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Joachim (joachim@boitam.eu)'s status on Saturday, 04-Jan-2025 19:07:20 JST Joachim Joachim
      in reply to
      • Sara Joy :happy_pepper:

      @sarajw @fonts the processes only goal seems to be to justify itself 😅

      I wonder if there’s also a sexist dimension to that evolution. Just like in the frontend world where JS reinvented the wheel using React and sidelined the html+css folks (where a big number of women developers had ended up because of the false idea that html & css weren’t worthwhile, manly languages). Wouldn’t it be possible that the separation of UX and UI as disciplines, and the piling up of new processes and tools, were used to displace women designers?
      In my experience design was a rare place with more women workers. I don’t know where it’s at now.

      In conversation about 4 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Sara Joy :happy_pepper: (sarajw@front-end.social)'s status on Saturday, 04-Jan-2025 19:07:21 JST Sara Joy :happy_pepper: Sara Joy :happy_pepper:
      in reply to
      • Joachim

      @joachim @fonts yes you've eloquently put much of what I was thinking - everyone has an opinion and lots of people think they could just "do design" (they often can't, but they still have opinions when designs are placed in front of them) - but if the design choices are backed up by all this laborious process, they can't really argue any more.

      In conversation about 4 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Joachim (joachim@boitam.eu)'s status on Saturday, 04-Jan-2025 19:33:41 JST Joachim Joachim
      in reply to
      • Sara Joy :happy_pepper:

      @sarajw @fonts oh thanks, I didn’t know the term!

      In conversation about 4 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Sara Joy :happy_pepper: (sarajw@front-end.social)'s status on Saturday, 04-Jan-2025 19:33:42 JST Sara Joy :happy_pepper: Sara Joy :happy_pepper:
      in reply to
      • Joachim

      @joachim @fonts there's an idea I've seen cropping up lately of "male flight" - which feels relevant to this - probably because kottke shared it recently: https://kottke.org/25/01/0045954-male-college-enrollment-c

      Design maybe got too woman-y, the men flew out into UX. Then that has got too woman-y, and now people are starting to ring the death knells for that: https://trends.uxdesign.cc/

      In conversation about 4 months ago permalink

      Attachments


      1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: images.squarespace-cdn.com
        The State of UX in 2025
        from Fabricio Teixeira, Caio Braga
        From design tools, to our design process, to the user behaviors that will change the way we design — a list of what to expect for User Experience (UX) Design in the next year.

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.