@Arkana >that actually sees it as an issue and were trying to sound an alarm It really isn't an issue if the population ends up halving over 100 years, as there's enough people in all those countries that it doesn't matter.
The real issue the economies designed to only work if a line keeps going up exponentially.
@Arkana >there are issues because some small rural towns were composed of mostly elderly people. That's is an issue, although not that bad as it will eventually sort itself out really.
>Ideally that would mean cheaper real estate for people to build new houses there Outside of the cities, land and houses are dirt cheap (houses after 30 years get valued at $0 tax wise, so people often just abandon old houses) and there are many abandoned rural houses available at the cost of only a low yearly land tax.
>unless it's an easily accessible area that might not happen Not many people are interested in rural areas only reachable by car as the vehicle loicencing system is pretty screwed.
Maybe the demographic problem would be reduced if the glut of weebs were allowed in, but why would they do that?
@Suiseiseki In Japan there are issues because some small rural towns were composed of mostly elderly people. Ideally that would mean cheaper real estate for people to build new houses there, but unless it's an easily accessible area that might not happen