@Arkana >there are issues because some small rural towns were composed of mostly elderly people.
That's is an issue, although not that bad as it will eventually sort itself out really.

>Ideally that would mean cheaper real estate for people to build new houses there
Outside of the cities, land and houses are dirt cheap (houses after 30 years get valued at $0 tax wise, so people often just abandon old houses) and there are many abandoned rural houses available at the cost of only a low yearly land tax.

>unless it's an easily accessible area that might not happen
Not many people are interested in rural areas only reachable by car as the vehicle loicencing system is pretty screwed.


Maybe the demographic problem would be reduced if the glut of weebs were allowed in, but why would they do that?