☭ 𝗖 𝗔 𝗧 ☭
A sharp and acute pain that becomes deeper as time passes in congruence with the body going in shock. A rapid heart rate, shallow breath, clammy skin, and disorientation, all caused by the hemorrhaging from the wound, not to mention the potential nerve, organ, and bone damage, all happening while lying on the cold ground, left to perish alone.
These are the last experiences of Brian Thompson, former CEO of UnitedHealthcare.
He didn't experience 1/1000ths of the pain he inflicted onto others.
☭ 𝗖 𝗔 𝗧 ☭
Did I even mention Luigi Mangione? No, I didn't. I've only stated a fact that the pain Brian Thompson experienced in his last moments didn't surmount even close to the pain he inflicted onto others by denying them healthcare.
Brain Bug
@Radical_EgoCom You are not seriously applauding to a murder, are you?
☭ 𝗖 𝗔 𝗧 ☭
You're trying to find some hidden message in my words when there is none. The message is exactly what it says. I'm pointing out that the pain that Brian Thompson experienced is significantly less than the pain he caused others though his actions. That's it.
Brain Bug
@Radical_EgoCom What do you want to express with this?
☭ 𝗖 𝗔 𝗧 ☭
Fascist in Germany: "Jews are evil, and we should kill them."
Me: "This CEO caused the suffering and deaths of millions of people, and when he died, he did not experience a fraction of the suffering he caused."
No, those aren't the same things, and you have to be an absolute buffoon or a disingenuous twat to think otherwise.
Brain Bug
@Radical_EgoCom Sorry, don't be kidding me. You know exactly what I mean and what you said. Your argumenation goes the same way as the typical fascist, making a hint, not saying something explicitly, but everybody knows what is meant, and later say "Oh what, I didn't say something evil, it is you who intentionally interprets me wrong". Thus us exactly the way the fascists currently operate in Germany, and it is not how we should act to fight them. Never ever.
☭ 𝗖 𝗔 𝗧 ☭
As I've already told you, but which you seem to not have the ability to comprehend, I didn't celebrate anyone's death in the original comment, and you repeatedly accusing me of doing so doesn't make your lie/delusion true. Just because someone points out that a person who got murdered was a bad person and didn't suffer as much as they made others suffer doesn't mean they're celebrating their death. 1/2
Brain Bug
@admin @Radical_EgoCom I am not mourning for this guy or feel sympathy for him. I even don't know who that is. "Not mourning" for somebody is different from celebrating somebody's death, which I do not expect from somebody defining him/herself as leftist.
SlightlyCyberpunk
@junior42 @Radical_EgoCom Not the person you asked, but I see it as a refutation of the current media circus which wants us to feel sorry for him...while explicitly NOT feeling sorry for any of his own victims. If we should mourn him, then we must mourn his victims a thousand times more. If we should not mourn them, then we certainly should not feel a single twinge sympathy for him.
☭ 𝗖 𝗔 𝗧 ☭
If you were alive in the 1940s, you'd probably demonize people for celebrating Hitler's suicide because "that'll make us just as bad as him." 2/2
☭ 𝗖 𝗔 𝗧 ☭
In regards to this conversation, I don't really care what German fascists are doing right now. You're the one who brought them up to try to accuse me of acting like a fascist just for stating an actual fact regarding the death of Brian Thompson, that being that he didn't suffer as much as he made others suffer, an attempt by me to bring to light how much suffering he's caused, but which you misconstrued either due to ignorance or spite.
Brain Bug
@Radical_EgoCom You got no clue what german fascists currently are doing here, do you?
☭ 𝗖 𝗔 𝗧 ☭
You made an accusation that I'm celebrating someone's death somehow by pointing out true facts about their death and their previous actions and provided no proof. You proved nothing. All you did was make a baseless accusation.
Brain Bug
@Radical_EgoCom @admin The bad thing is that you know exactly what I mean and that I am right, and still write some distracting nonsense that has nothing to do with what I am saying. This means you do not even act like that by mistake, but deliberately.
☭ 𝗖 𝗔 𝗧 ☭
That's not the same thing. Someone trying to suggest that all immigrants are murderers or rapist due to the actions of one or a few immigrants isn't the same as me pointing out that 1 individual definitively caused a lot of suffering and when they died did not suffer as much as the people they made suffer. I'm not bringing up other CEOs. I'm talking about 1 person and displaying how horrible they were by magnifying the gravity of their negative impact on society by... 1/2
Brain Bug
@Radical_EgoCom mean this, I will change my misunderstandable words"
Or 2. Explain again and again that you are only stating facts innocently and the fault is on my side by interpeting something you never meant and these two facty are totaly independent and have nothing to do with each other and... - exactly the tactics I described above.
You chose 2. That's why I don't believe you that you only want to innocently state two facts and make no connection between them.
Do you get what I mean? 3/3
Brain Bug
@Radical_EgoCom always act like currently (you do do not even have to look at Germany, when Trump says "Patriots know what to do now" and the crowd attacks the Capitol, it is the same).
So, when you describe the pain of this guy and compare it to the pain of his victims, you connect these two facts and give this connection a meaning.
When I accuse you of celebrating the murder by this connection, you have 2 options:
1. "Oh, it can be understood like THAT? Thanks for pointing out, I did not 2/?
Brain Bug
@Radical_EgoCom When somebody says: "Again, it was an immigrant who raped a german woman! Everybody who has a weapon at home knows what to do now!" - is this an explicit call to violence against immigrants? No, because nobody said "Go out and kill immigrants!" Is it an implicit call to violence? Yes, because everybody understands the connection. Can somebody who said this defend by saying "Oh, well, this is NOT what I intended, I was just stating facts". Yes, and this is what german fascists 1/?
☭ 𝗖 𝗔 𝗧 ☭
...comparing it to the suffering of their last moments.
You suck, by the way. 2/2
☭ 𝗖 𝗔 𝗧 ☭
You didn't try. You did explain what you mean, and I pointed out how you made a false equivalency between a fascist saying that all immigrants are violent because some are violent and me pointing out how Brian Thompson was a horrible person by comparing his suffering to the suffering he caused towards others.
Brain Bug
@admin Please see the ongoing discussion with @Radical_EgoCom where I tried to explain what I mean:
https://norden.social/@junior42/113657597954785611
SlightlyCyberpunk
@junior42 @Radical_EgoCom Yeah but as I said I also see no celebration there, merely a refusal to comply with the various media billionaires who demand mourning. Which you seem to be in agreement on.
Like I am honestly confused what part of any of these comments you see as celebratory...that is not the tone I am parsing from this at all man...
☭ 𝗖 𝗔 𝗧 ☭
Fact 1 = the guy felt pain✅️
Fact 2 = his victims felt much more pain✅️
Connection: This is justice.❌️
I never once said or implied that it is justice, yet you've constantly accused me of claiming that it is justice, specifically of celebrating it. You haven't proven that I'm claiming that this is justice. Your speculations aren't proof.
Brain Bug
@Radical_EgoCom @admin That was not my point. My point was connecting two issues and thus giving this connection a meaning, whilst denying this meaning when confronted with it.
Example 1:
Fact 1 = "Immigrant raped woman"
Fact 2 = "Who has weapons knows what to do"
Connection: "If you have weapons, kill immigrants"
Example 2:
Fact 1 = the guy felt pain
Fact 2 = his victims felt much more pain
Connection: This is justice.
Yes, I know you will deny this again. The connection is made anyway.
Alexandre Oliva (moving to @lxo@snac.lx.oliva.nom.br)
GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.