GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPは日本のGNU socialサーバーです。
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. Embed this notice
    mcc (mcc@mastodon.social)'s status on Saturday, 14-Dec-2024 10:59:51 JST mcc mcc

    Made a post on Bluesky about moderation problems on Bluesky. Got this reply. My gut response is okay, weird offtopic reply. Then I thought about it and was like, wait, I don't know enough about the referenced philosophy to know if this makes sense, it might actually be relevant. Then I thought about it some more and was like wait, is it actually the case bluesky is fundamentally anarcholibertarian while Mastodon is fundamentally anarchosyndicalist…? Instances as reification of interest groups?

    In conversation Saturday, 14-Dec-2024 10:59:51 JST from mastodon.social permalink

    Attachments


    1. https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/113/648/487/543/211/224/original/0d8b68b83e38ad89.png
    • Embed this notice
      Matthew Merkovich (mattmerk@mastodon.social)'s status on Saturday, 14-Dec-2024 10:59:50 JST Matthew Merkovich Matthew Merkovich
      in reply to
      • AnarchoNinaWrites

      @mcc I would pose this question to @AnarchoNinaWrites
      I'm frankly not up to the theory end of this task. I get anarcho-syndicalism conceptually, but I never got past how having a trade-union-centric approach could ever lead to abolishing the state. I've always viewed trade unionism as a pure democracy in the workplace at whatever scale, but that results in stratification of leadership. So like I said, I'm useless on the more granular theory here, and would love to hear more myself.

      In conversation Saturday, 14-Dec-2024 10:59:50 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      AnarchoNinaWrites (anarchoninawrites@jorts.horse)'s status on Saturday, 14-Dec-2024 10:59:50 JST AnarchoNinaWrites AnarchoNinaWrites
      in reply to
      • Matthew Merkovich

      @MattMerk Unspeakably rude of you to tag me into someone's rant to ask me to teach someone I don't know something they can google on their own. I'm a busy lady and libraries are free.

      https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/rudolf-rocker-anarchosyndicalism

      In conversation Saturday, 14-Dec-2024 10:59:50 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      mcc (mcc@mastodon.social)'s status on Saturday, 14-Dec-2024 10:59:51 JST mcc mcc
      in reply to

      Anarchist men, if you have daydreams about a cute girl going "gosh~! i sure do wish someone would explain anarchosyndicalism to me!"— THIS IS YOUR MOMENT. IT HAS COME.

      In conversation Saturday, 14-Dec-2024 10:59:51 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Rich Felker (dalias@hachyderm.io)'s status on Sunday, 15-Dec-2024 12:32:21 JST Rich Felker Rich Felker
      in reply to
      • ch0ccyra1n

      @ch0ccyra1n @mcc Except their users just move. Mastodon (rather the fedi) is a mix of all kinds of models that heavily incentivizes the shit ones dying out.

      In conversation Sunday, 15-Dec-2024 12:32:21 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      ch0ccyra1n (ch0ccyra1n@emeraldsocial.org)'s status on Sunday, 15-Dec-2024 12:32:22 JST ch0ccyra1n ch0ccyra1n
      in reply to

      @mcc mastodon and the fediverse more broadly is extremely authoritarian imo. Instance admins are little dictators who get to control what information that "their" users see.

      In conversation Sunday, 15-Dec-2024 12:32:22 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Rich Felker (dalias@hachyderm.io)'s status on Sunday, 15-Dec-2024 12:35:49 JST Rich Felker Rich Felker
      in reply to

      @mcc I don't understand it in any deep level but I think it's still stuck on the legacy communist centering of labor, in an age where there's no good reason for our lives to be centered around labor. The problem is that we have means of production (and extreme abundance of production) that hardly depend on labor, and need new mechanisms that classic syndicalism doesn't provide to ensure it's operated fairly for everyone's benefit.

      In conversation Sunday, 15-Dec-2024 12:35:49 JST permalink
      Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell: likes this.
    • Embed this notice
      Rich Felker (dalias@hachyderm.io)'s status on Sunday, 15-Dec-2024 12:37:43 JST Rich Felker Rich Felker
      in reply to
      • ch0ccyra1n

      @ch0ccyra1n @mcc It's not a boot if they can't keep you under it. And it's not a dictator unless a single person or small group without a better governance model controls everything.

      In conversation Sunday, 15-Dec-2024 12:37:43 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      ch0ccyra1n (ch0ccyra1n@emeraldsocial.org)'s status on Sunday, 15-Dec-2024 12:37:44 JST ch0ccyra1n ch0ccyra1n
      in reply to
      • Rich Felker

      @dalias @mcc in that respect, I suppose instance admins are more like nonprofit executives, who are also still little dictators. At least users can choose who's boot they're under /s

      In conversation Sunday, 15-Dec-2024 12:37:44 JST permalink
      Rich Felker repeated this.
    • Embed this notice
      ch0ccyra1n (ch0ccyra1n@emeraldsocial.org)'s status on Sunday, 15-Dec-2024 12:37:45 JST ch0ccyra1n ch0ccyra1n
      in reply to
      • Rich Felker

      @dalias @mcc there's no option to not have an admin that doesn't also require taking on that role yourself. I would prefer to have all interactions be handled directly between users in a peer-to-peer manner. At least then there truly is no hierarchy involved.

      In conversation Sunday, 15-Dec-2024 12:37:45 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Rich Felker (dalias@hachyderm.io)'s status on Sunday, 15-Dec-2024 12:39:43 JST Rich Felker Rich Felker
      in reply to
      • ch0ccyra1n

      @ch0ccyra1n @mcc Governance does not have to be hierarchical.

      In conversation Sunday, 15-Dec-2024 12:39:43 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      ch0ccyra1n (ch0ccyra1n@emeraldsocial.org)'s status on Sunday, 15-Dec-2024 12:39:44 JST ch0ccyra1n ch0ccyra1n
      in reply to
      • Rich Felker

      @dalias @mcc I consider any form of governance to be just dictatorship lite. But I can understand why one would disagree with such an assessment. I simply do not think it is right to have any sort of hierarchy and I think it is one of the biggest flaws with both centralized and federated models of social networking.

      In conversation Sunday, 15-Dec-2024 12:39:44 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Rich Felker (dalias@hachyderm.io)'s status on Sunday, 15-Dec-2024 13:17:09 JST Rich Felker Rich Felker
      in reply to
      • ch0ccyra1n

      @ch0ccyra1n @mcc Kinda real world example: a jury is empowered to make seriously decisions that are a form of governance, but they're not part of a hierarchical social relationship, and ideally chosen explicitly not to be.

      In conversation Sunday, 15-Dec-2024 13:17:09 JST permalink
      Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell: likes this.
    • Embed this notice
      Budsofstone (budsofstone@computerfairi.es)'s status on Sunday, 15-Dec-2024 13:59:29 JST Budsofstone Budsofstone
      in reply to
      • ch0ccyra1n
      • Rich Felker

      @ch0ccyra1n @dalias @mcc I view instance Admins more as community members taking on the roles of bouncer and bar tender at the punk bar. There is room for improvement on community feed back and inclusion on decision making. And abuse is possible more antiabuse functions should be added to further prevent it, but I'm happy there is someone to kick that first I'm a nice Nazi out. And keep the beer tap working.

      In conversation Sunday, 15-Dec-2024 13:59:29 JST permalink

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.