Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Strypey (strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz)'s status on Saturday, 07-Dec-2024 09:44:32 JST Strypey

   BlueSky is to the ATmosphere what Goggle is to the modern web. Discuss.

   Keen to read arguments both for and against, including within the same post. Reasoned arguments I disagree with get more points than knee-jerk hot takes I agree with. Go!

   #BlueSky #ATmosphere #Google #web

   • Embed this notice
     The Nexus of Privacy (thenexusofprivacy@infosec.exchange)'s status on Saturday, 07-Dec-2024 09:43:52 JST The Nexus of Privacy

     in reply to

     It sounds like the only two things that we we agree on in this discussion is that Bluesky's whole-network Relay is currently to the ATmosphere what Google's search engine is to the modern web, and that people can use "proprietary" however they want and some meanings are more effective than others.

     The actually-existing fediverse is not good at being a large flat network -- missing replies, the challenges of global search (especially on small instances), etc. So if the belief that AT's better for a large flat network seems obviously wrong to you, you're either ignoring these issues, or optimistically assuming there's a solution.

     Conversely, parts of the actually-existing fediverse are actually quite good at scoped-visibility (as opposed to all-pulblic) networked communities (as opposed to a flat Twitter-like network). Unfortnantely that's not the model Eugen likes, so Mastodon doesn't support it particularly well. So if you think it's obviously wrong that AP is currently better than AT for this, you're probably confusing Mastodon with the broader fediverse. Of course, people are working on scoped-visibility networked communities in the AT ecosystem as well, so AP's lead might be tenuous, but it's still experimental over there. Time will tell!

     @strypey

   • Embed this notice
     Strypey (strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz)'s status on Saturday, 07-Dec-2024 09:43:57 JST Strypey

     in reply to

     (2/2)

     @thenexusofprivacy
     >AP isn’t good for flat all-public networks

     I've seen this claim made, along with the corresponding claim that AP is better for private social networking. It seems obviously wrong.

     As your own research reveals, the existing fediverse isn't much better for private communication than the DataFarms. While orgs having a fediverse account on their own server is better than having a traditional website, under their own domain name, because any AP app can follow and comment.

     Hrefna (DHC) repeated this.
   • Embed this notice
     Strypey (strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz)'s status on Saturday, 07-Dec-2024 09:44:00 JST Strypey

     in reply to

     • The Nexus of Privacy

     (1/?)

     @thenexusofprivacy
     > if you want to try to convince other AP loyalists that AT’s not proprietary

     If people want to use terms inappropriately, in ways that blunt their incisiveness, that's their business. I'm more than happy to debate anyone who wants to convince me that AT is a proprietary protocol. They know where to find me.

     TL;DR BlueSky is centralised, but whether the protocol is open or proprietary is mostly irrelevant to the reasons for that.

   • Embed this notice
     The Nexus of Privacy (thenexusofprivacy@infosec.exchange)'s status on Saturday, 07-Dec-2024 09:44:01 JST The Nexus of Privacy

     in reply to

     @strypey well, if you want to try to convince other AP loyalists that AT’s not proprietary just because specs have been published and they’ve let people know about the relatively infrequent breaking changes, go for it, but my impression is that most people think protocols controlled by a single company are proprietary. But whatever, if the analogy don’t work for you it doesn’t work for you!

     Thr impression I get from people who are looking at setting up relays is that there’s no way they’d do it on a fediverse infrastructure so I’m not sure why you think otherwise. AP isn’t good for flat all-public networks and that’s what they’re interested in. In practice it’s probably a moot point because I don’t Bluesky’s going away any time soon, but time will tell!

   • Embed this notice
     Strypey (strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz)'s status on Saturday, 07-Dec-2024 09:44:06 JST Strypey

     in reply to

     Coda: ATmosphere without BS is - technically speaking - just a bad Nostr clone. The only things attracting anyone to it now are the VC-funded rapid prototyping, and the big bump in population making the news. Which as we've seen with Eternal November in the fediverse, only keeps a network growing for so long.

   • Embed this notice
     Strypey (strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz)'s status on Saturday, 07-Dec-2024 09:44:09 JST Strypey

     in reply to

     (2/2)

     @thenexusofprivacy
     > the Gnu Social network survived the pumpocalypse, if Bluesky ... shuts down I’d expect the ATmosphere to survive

     Perhaps, but I doubt it, for 2 reasons. First, the key technical difference I described in the OP. The second is a consequence of this; the people most likely to have the skills to set up a new centralised aggregator (relay) are more likely to see the weakness of the BS/AT model -especially after a total crash - and set up fediverse servers instead.

   • Embed this notice
     Strypey (strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz)'s status on Saturday, 07-Dec-2024 09:44:13 JST Strypey

     in reply to

     • The Nexus of Privacy

     (1/?)

     @thenexusofprivacy
     > the proprietary protocol they developed

     Not being vetted by a standards body is *not* what makes a protocol proprietary. The criteria for that are things like not having a published spec, and making breaking changes without consulting (or at least warning) independent implementers.

   • Embed this notice
     The Nexus of Privacy (thenexusofprivacy@infosec.exchange)'s status on Saturday, 07-Dec-2024 09:44:14 JST The Nexus of Privacy

     in reply to

     @strypey I meant StatusNet the company, including the servers they ran, the software they provided, the proprietary protocol they developed. And yes the Gnu Social network survived the pumpocalypse, if Bluesky does something similar or shuts down I’d expect the ATmosphere to survive as well

   • Embed this notice
     Strypey (strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz)'s status on Saturday, 07-Dec-2024 09:44:20 JST Strypey

     in reply to

     • The Nexus of Privacy

     (2/2)

     I had to think about this one for a minute.

     @thenexusofprivacy
     > Bluesky is currently to the ATmosphere what StatusNet was to the Identiverse

     This neologism is new to me. From context, I presume you mean the network of servers running StatusNet (or implementing OStatus)?

     The most obvious difference is that when Identi.ca switched to pump.io, the rest of that network could continue to communicate. People running independent BS PDS would have to set up a new relay and appview.

   • Embed this notice
     The Nexus of Privacy (thenexusofprivacy@infosec.exchange)'s status on Saturday, 07-Dec-2024 09:44:26 JST The Nexus of Privacy

     in reply to

     @strypey Bluesky is currently to the ATmosphere what StatusNet was to the Identiverse back in the day (only moreso): a venture-funded startup that controls the protocol and runs what's by far the largest server.

     Bluesky's Relay is currently to the ATmosphere what Google' search engine is to the modern web (only moreso)

   • Embed this notice
     Strypey (strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz)'s status on Saturday, 07-Dec-2024 09:44:26 JST Strypey

     in reply to

     • The Nexus of Privacy

     (1/2)

     @thenexusofprivacy
     > Bluesky's Relay is currently to the ATmosphere what Google' search engine is to the modern web (only moreso)

     That's exactly what I was thinking when I made the post.

   • Embed this notice
     morph (morph@morphnet.de)'s status on Saturday, 07-Dec-2024 16:28:56 JST morph

     in reply to

     @strypey The "Mastodon Brahman Caste" made my day. 😄

   • Embed this notice
     Strypey (strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz)'s status on Saturday, 07-Dec-2024 16:28:58 JST Strypey

     in reply to

     (2/?)

     Lack of replies and global search are limitations of Mastodon software, not of AP as a protocol, or the fediverse as a network. Many fediverse projects have better support for functions like these, although there is FEP work underway to improve on them.

     FWIW projects to improve these things have often been knobbled by the MBC (Mastodon Brahman Caste, also known as the Homeowners Association, I think you know who I mean).

   • Embed this notice
     Strypey (strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz)'s status on Saturday, 07-Dec-2024 16:29:00 JST Strypey

     in reply to

     • The Nexus of Privacy

     (1/?)

     @thenexusofprivacy
     You raise some good points, and I'm starting to understand what people are getting at when they argue BS = better for public, Mastodon = better for private.

     But the reasons for a lot of our apparent disagreements come down to 2 things.

     First, your arguments implicitly treat AP/ fediverse as synonymous with Mastodon. If I say fediverse, I mean the whole network. If I say AP, I mean the protocol as standardised by W3C and extended by FEPs. If I mean Mastodon, I say so.