Conversation

Notices

Embed this notice
?? Humpleupagus ?? (humpleupagus@eveningzoo.club)'s status on Saturday, 30-Nov-2024 14:34:16 JST ?? Humpleupagus ??
- FreedomPatriot
What if I told you that anarchy is the only state and government is the result of it? 🤔

In conversation about 7 months ago from eveningzoo.club permalink
- Embed this notice
  MasterSimper (mastersimper@eveningzoo.club)'s status on Saturday, 30-Nov-2024 14:57:21 JST MasterSimper
  in reply to
  - FreedomPatriot
  What government did the monkeys use?
  
  In conversation about 7 months ago permalink
- Embed this notice
  ?? Humpleupagus ?? (humpleupagus@eveningzoo.club)'s status on Saturday, 30-Nov-2024 14:57:21 JST ?? Humpleupagus ??
  in reply to
  - MasterSimper
  - FreedomPatriot
  Bonobos keep order by fucking each other in the butt. Would you like to return to monke? 😏
  
  In conversation about 7 months ago permalink
- Embed this notice
  ?? Humpleupagus ?? (humpleupagus@eveningzoo.club)'s status on Saturday, 30-Nov-2024 15:11:18 JST ?? Humpleupagus ??
  in reply to
  The way you define anarchy just establishes that it's nothing more than an chimera. There is has never been, not will there ever be, such a state as "an absence of rulers."
  
  You also make a severe logical mistake by entailing that a sovereign can break rules. A sovereign cannot. This is law 101. The sovereign is itself not bound by laws.
  
  In conversation about 7 months ago permalink
- Embed this notice
  shortstories@merovingian.club's status on Saturday, 30-Nov-2024 15:11:19 JST shortstories
  in reply to
  - MasterSimper
  - FreedomPatriot
  @Humpleupagus @freepatriot @MasterSimper
  Anomie is the absence of laws
  Anarchy is the absence of rulers
  Rulers make excuses for breaking rules by maintaining a monopoly on breaking the rules that they say other people should keep
  
  In conversation about 7 months ago permalink
- Embed this notice
  ?? Humpleupagus ?? (humpleupagus@eveningzoo.club)'s status on Saturday, 30-Nov-2024 16:13:24 JST ?? Humpleupagus ??
  in reply to
  A sovereign who is prosecuted isn't a sovereign at the time of prosecution. They are subject. Simple as. You don't understand sovereignty.
  
  In conversation about 7 months ago permalink
- Embed this notice
  shortstories@merovingian.club's status on Saturday, 30-Nov-2024 16:13:25 JST shortstories
  in reply to
  @koropokkur @Humpleupagus @MasterSimper @freepatriot
  If a sovereign can not break rules then one sovereign can not prosecute another sovereign for war crimes nor would there be wars between one sovereign and another sovereign in response to rules that one sovereign said the other sovereign broke
  
  In conversation about 7 months ago permalink
- Embed this notice
  shortstories@merovingian.club's status on Saturday, 30-Nov-2024 16:13:26 JST shortstories
  in reply to
  @koropokkur @Humpleupagus @MasterSimper @freepatriot
  "In international relations theory, the concept of anarchy is the idea that the world lacks any supreme authority or sovereignty"
  "International relations generally does not understand "anarchy" as signifying a world in chaos, disorder, or conflict; rather, it is possible for ordered relations between states to be maintained in an anarchic international system.[1]"
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchy_(international_relations)
  In conversation about 7 months ago permalink
  Attachments
  1. No result found on File_thumbnail lookup.
    
    Anarchy (international relations)
    
    In international relations theory, the concept of anarchy is the idea that the world lacks any supreme authority or sovereignty. In an anarchic state, there is no hierarchically superior, coercive power that can resolve disputes, enforce law, or order the system of international politics. In international relations, anarchy is widely accepted as the starting point for international relations theory. International relations generally does not understand "anarchy" as signifying a world in chaos, disorder, or conflict; rather, it is possible for ordered relations between states to be maintained in an anarchic international system. Anarchy provides foundations for realist, neorealist, and neoliberal, and constructivist paradigms of international relations. Liberal theory disputes that anarchy is a fundamental condition of the international system. The constructivist scholar Alexander Wendt argued, "anarchy is what states make of it." Etymology The word anarchy literally means "without a leader", combining the Greek prefix "an-" meaning without, with the Indo-European root arkh meaning "begin" or "take the lead...
- Embed this notice
  Horntoise (koropokkur@eveningzoo.club)'s status on Saturday, 30-Nov-2024 16:13:27 JST Horntoise
  in reply to
  anarchy used to be considered the furthest right on the political spectrum but a bunch of faggots took it over and made it all leftist and gay. they did the same thing to libertarianism.
  
  In conversation about 7 months ago permalink
- Embed this notice
  shortstories@merovingian.club's status on Saturday, 30-Nov-2024 16:13:27 JST shortstories
  in reply to
  @koropokkur @Humpleupagus @MasterSimper @freepatriot
  If a sovereign can not break rules then how can one sovereign punish another sovereign for breaking rules without a worldwide government?
  Is it legal for the one sovereign to punish the other sovereign?
  If it is not legal then you have international anarchy
  If it is legal for one sovereign to punish another sovereign for breaking rules then a sovereign can break rules
  
  In conversation about 7 months ago permalink

Public

Conversation

Notices

Feeds