Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
lainy (lain@lain.com)'s status on Thursday, 07-Nov-2024 03:09:15 JST lainy
“It’s illegal to profit off it” the incredible retardation of the copyright mind -
Embed this notice
zonk (zonk@shitposter.world)'s status on Thursday, 07-Nov-2024 03:12:15 JST zonk
@lain noooooo not the hecking government created monopoly..... lainy likes this. -
Embed this notice
lainy (lain@lain.com)'s status on Thursday, 07-Nov-2024 03:12:41 JST lainy
@ocean i just delete all Roms in 24 hours, I’m safe -
Embed this notice
oshy (ocean@raru.re)'s status on Thursday, 07-Nov-2024 03:12:46 JST oshy
@lain All you have to do is say "no copyright intended"
-
Embed this notice
翠星石 (suiseiseki@freesoftwareextremist.com)'s status on Thursday, 07-Nov-2024 14:40:47 JST 翠星石
@lain In many cases it wouldn't be a problem if you could do whatever you would like with a work as long as you didn't net a profit, but that is not what copyright law has written.
Copyright heavily restricts works whether you profit or not. -
Embed this notice
翠星石 (suiseiseki@freesoftwareextremist.com)'s status on Thursday, 07-Nov-2024 14:43:15 JST 翠星石
@ocean @lain >say "no copyright intended"
Copyright is applied to every creative work automatically whether you want it to be copyrighted or not.
Such sentence is not even an informal license, so that works out to be; "No copyright intended [but it is still copyrighted]". -
Embed this notice
翠星石 (suiseiseki@freesoftwareextremist.com)'s status on Thursday, 07-Nov-2024 14:50:58 JST 翠星石
@ocean @lain Unless such material has been validly placed, or has fallen into the public domain (the exception rather than the norm), it's always copyrighted, so I don't see why you would bother to write "copyrighted material". -
Embed this notice
oshy (ocean@raru.re)'s status on Thursday, 07-Nov-2024 14:50:59 JST oshy
@Suiseiseki @lain It's a reference to the old days on youtube when people would upload copyrighted material and say "no copyright intended" in the description
-
Embed this notice