Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Dr. Sex, Ph.d, Esq. (doctorsex@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Tuesday, 29-Oct-2024 06:30:34 JST Dr. Sex, Ph.d, Esq.
   "Lolicons" will insist it's not pedohilia but also get uniquely cagey about the word
   • BowserNoodle ☦️ likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 29-Oct-2024 08:09:19 JST Bread up, Bro

     in reply to

     • Matty
     • Woodshop ?
     • Blank
     @WoodshopHandman @Type_Other @doctorsex @matty the problem with killing people based on this is that you'd be killing a lot of people.
   • Embed this notice
     Woodshop ? (woodshophandman@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 29-Oct-2024 08:09:20 JST Woodshop ?

     in reply to

     • Matty
     • Blank
     @Type_Other @doctorsex @matty I feel like we should kill those people
     If the only thing keeping you "doing the right thing" is threat of consequences for not doing it, are you really "doing the right thing" at all, since you're basically doing it unwillingly, out of fear?
   • Embed this notice
     Blank (type_other@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 29-Oct-2024 08:09:21 JST Blank

     in reply to

     • Matty
     @doctorsex @matty I think most don't do anything for the same reason people into vore probably wouldn't actually want to be eaten alive if the opportunity presented itself. The cost is insane compared to what you'd get out of it.
     
     Unless child pussy is like some injection of turbo-heroin that even a crumb is worth dying for, only the dumbest of criminals with zero future planning will actually act on it.
   • Embed this notice
     Woodshop ? (woodshophandman@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 29-Oct-2024 08:09:21 JST Woodshop ?

     in reply to

     • Matty
     • Blank
     @Type_Other @doctorsex @matty So it's a question of "if there's no consequences, they'd do it 100%" then? That doesn't inspire much confidence
   • Embed this notice
     Blank (type_other@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 29-Oct-2024 08:09:21 JST Blank

     in reply to

     • Matty
     • Woodshop ?
     @WoodshopHandman @doctorsex @matty Yeah, I think a lot more people would do very fucked up things if not for the threat of the law bringing the hammer down on them.
   • Embed this notice
     Matty (matty@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Tuesday, 29-Oct-2024 08:09:22 JST Matty

     in reply to
     >erm it's actually not pedophilia because it's just a drawing that looks like a child, and isn't an actual child
     >erm look at these screen shots of anti anime people being outed as pedophiles heh bet you didn't see that one coming chud
     >erm just because I want to fuck the drawing that looks exactly like a prepubescent child doesn't mean I would ever do it if given the opportunity
     
     I hate them so fuckin much lmao
   • Embed this notice
     Dr. Sex, Ph.d, Esq. (doctorsex@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Tuesday, 29-Oct-2024 08:09:22 JST Dr. Sex, Ph.d, Esq.

     in reply to

     • Matty
     I am perfectly willing to accept that the majority of people who consume it probably wouldn't do anything to an actual child but if you're going to go out there and go out of your way to spank your spunk monkey to stuff specifically meant to resemble a child you've gotta do some self reflection there
   • Embed this notice
     Woodshop ? (woodshophandman@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 29-Oct-2024 08:14:41 JST Woodshop ?

     in reply to

     • Matty
     • Bread up, Bro
     • Blank
     @sickburnbro @Type_Other @doctorsex @matty
   • Embed this notice
     Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 29-Oct-2024 08:14:41 JST Bread up, Bro

     in reply to

     • Matty
     • Woodshop ?
     • Blank
     @WoodshopHandman @Type_Other @doctorsex @matty 🤷