GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPは日本のGNU socialサーバーです。
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. Embed this notice
    Philip Weiss (Phil in SF) (kingrat@sfba.social)'s status on Saturday, 19-Oct-2024 23:55:56 JST Philip Weiss (Phil in SF) Philip Weiss (Phil in SF)

    The two real problems that prevent solving the high cost of housing are people who don't want housing of a particular type (housing for poor people or housing for rich people) in a particular place and authorities that defer to them. These are people problems, not logistics problems. Everything else is pretty easily solvable if we can resolve one or both of those.

    Those aren't easy to solve tho. So whenever I see a post with "it's easy" to solve the housing crisis, I think, "Have you met people?" If convincing people of the obvious right thing was easy, quite a few problems would be solved.

    In conversation about 7 months ago from sfba.social permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Philip Weiss (Phil in SF) (kingrat@sfba.social)'s status on Sunday, 20-Oct-2024 00:52:25 JST Philip Weiss (Phil in SF) Philip Weiss (Phil in SF)
      in reply to
      • Lyle Solla-Yates

      @Lyle Scale is a relatively easily solvable problem. People creating lots of little fiefdoms is the same as people not wanting housing of particular types in particular places.

      In conversation about 7 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Lyle Solla-Yates (lyle@cville.online)'s status on Sunday, 20-Oct-2024 00:52:27 JST Lyle Solla-Yates Lyle Solla-Yates
      in reply to

      @kingrat there’s also a giant scale problem. Making tons of little fiefdoms responsible for regulating housing supply without oversight (except some in CA) is not a reasonable path to success. They either need to be coordinated or replaced by something functional

      In conversation about 7 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Philip Weiss (Phil in SF) (kingrat@sfba.social)'s status on Sunday, 20-Oct-2024 02:58:01 JST Philip Weiss (Phil in SF) Philip Weiss (Phil in SF)
      in reply to
      • Owen

      @owen I'm not saying that's the way it should happen. Just that it's one of the two hard people problems.

      In conversation about 7 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Owen (owen@social.ridetrans.it)'s status on Sunday, 20-Oct-2024 02:58:02 JST Owen Owen
      in reply to

      @kingrat coming to this same conclusion has basically changed the way I think about electoral politics and representative government.

      I feel like my politics have become more essentially more elitist. we do actually need electeds who are willing to enact their preferred policies even if there's a lot of pushback

      In conversation about 7 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Philip Weiss (Phil in SF) (kingrat@sfba.social)'s status on Sunday, 20-Oct-2024 06:01:32 JST Philip Weiss (Phil in SF) Philip Weiss (Phil in SF)
      in reply to
      • scott f

      @scott Money is muuuuccch easier than convincing people to spend money.

      In conversation about 7 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      scott f (scott@carfree.city)'s status on Sunday, 20-Oct-2024 06:01:33 JST scott f scott f
      in reply to

      @kingrat You're missing the fiscal side of things. Public investment in housing used to be much greater, before Prop 13, Reagan, the Faircloth Amendment, end of Redevelopment in California. It doesn't turn a profit to build housing for the non-rich.

      In the Mission, activists fought housing for rich people as leverage to win funding for affordable housing. Whether or not you like the tactic, it worked. The City wouldn't have funded all these developments otherwise. https://missionlocal.org/2020/11/an-affordable-housing-boomlet-is-coming-to-the-mission/

      In conversation about 7 months ago permalink

      Attachments


      1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: missionloca.s3.amazonaws.com
        An affordable housing boomlet is coming to the Mission
        from Juan Carlos Lara
        This story provides an update to a list of 100-percent-affordable housing projects, with a total of 839 units, we drew up just over a year ago. At that
    • Embed this notice
      Philip Weiss (Phil in SF) (kingrat@sfba.social)'s status on Sunday, 20-Oct-2024 06:44:49 JST Philip Weiss (Phil in SF) Philip Weiss (Phil in SF)
      in reply to
      • zed

      @zed That's a longer way of saying that authorities are deferring to people who don't want housing in a particular place. Which is a hard problem to solve, because it's a people problem.

      In conversation about 7 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      zed (zed@mstdn.party)'s status on Sunday, 20-Oct-2024 06:44:50 JST zed zed
      in reply to

      @kingrat the solution isn’t to convince NIMBY’s, it’s to legislate by-right incremental development.

      If you’ve got a single family home, you should be able to walk in and out of a permitting office in one day with a permit to build a duplex , triplex, or triple decker.

      If you have a duplex/triplex, by right you should be able to build a 3-5 story apt building.

      You have a 5 story building, by right you should be able to build a 10 story building.

      No community input meetings needed.

      In conversation about 7 months ago permalink

      Attachments

      1. No result found on File_thumbnail lookup.
        building.no

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.