Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
i just had a revelation that sounds so fucking shitlib, yet it makes perfect sense
why were westoids pushing all that anti-racism, immigration bullshit? to limp-wristedly excuse their colonization campaigns and shit, so later down the line nobody ever gets the idea that england or france ever tried colonizing africa or asia, all to whitewash their rep for the future, given that they won't be listening to outsiders from their "kool kids klub" table all while writing in their history books that they were the good guys
what a pointless revelation but a revelation nonetheless, anyway back to more important matters, like noodles
-
Embed this notice
@VIPPER there's a terrible trend with the russian government since the 90s and that is aping the west, it started with gorbachev and yeltsin, and while putin tried to stop that later down the line, not everyone's really getting the big picture, either because of greed or ignorance, there's a bit too much autonomy in the russian government
-
Embed this notice
@lina There's that, but also it's a push to invite the barbarians because Westerners see them as superior to themselves, and certain accelerationists see them as a potential savior from the decay. When a civilization is in its throes of death this always happens. The Romans in the latter years of the empire saw the barbarians as superior to themselves or at least saw their system of governance as superior because they still had clear and consistent rules about how to organize society, while the Romans themselves had to abide by arbitrary and unbearable rules that always changed because the culture and the government were both in disarray.
If that sounds familiar is because it's happening right now to the West and slowly to Russia as well, though Russia is a few decades behind on that timeline because the Russians are trying to stop it.
-
Embed this notice
@cajax >so they write anti-racism into history books so they can point to that and be like "we're the ones who outlawed it!"?
yes, so they're immune to any sort of loopholes in their perfectly crafted rules they created to protect themselves from anyone in the international playing field
>a certain upper crust of white people, like the .1%, like so elite only like 1% of all jews are in it, see it as a way to keep people they perceive as their real competitors down. That's all this is.
that only goes in hand with what i figured out
>It's also racist as fuck-- they assume that they're so smart they're going to be able to convince these immigrants not to turn on THEM, who look so similar to the people they've been conditioned to see as enemies.
yes but because they were the ones who outlawed racism and brought in so many immigrants and refugees calling them racist will be ignored, so you know, there's more than one function for it
>I'm high as fuck rn sry dude
its ok im full of noodles
>
:D
-
Embed this notice
@lina what? so they write anti-racism into history books so they can point to that and be like "we're the ones who outlawed it!"?
IMO the real reason for anti-racism, besides being the logical outcome of enlightenment values (via postmodernism), is that a certain upper crust of white people, like the .1%, like so elite only like 1% of all jews are in it, see it as a way to keep people they perceive as their real competitors down. That's all this is. It's a way to pull the ladder up behind them after having climbed up so it doesn't get too crowded on top. It's also racist as fuck-- they assume that they're so smart they're going to be able to convince these immigrants not to turn on THEM, who look so similar to the people they've been conditioned to see as enemies. I'm high as fuck rn sry dude
-
Embed this notice
@cajax yea :ryukoeat:
-
Embed this notice
@lina noodles huh