GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPは日本のGNU socialサーバーです。
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. Embed this notice
    Laffy (gottalaff@mastodon.social)'s status on Friday, 27-Sep-2024 22:52:16 JST Laffy Laffy

    “A near majority of Americans favor amending the Constitution in order to elect presidents based on the popular vote, according to a poll released Friday.

    The Gallup survey found that 58 percent of Americans are in favor of making the change, while 39 percent still prefer the Electoral College system.”
    https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4902991-many-favor-electing-presidents-based-on-popular-vote-gallup/

    In conversation about 9 months ago from mastodon.social permalink

    Attachments


    • Embed this notice
      Paul Cantrell (inthehands@hachyderm.io)'s status on Saturday, 28-Sep-2024 00:35:53 JST Paul Cantrell Paul Cantrell
      in reply to
      • Michael Busch

      @michael_w_busch @GottaLaff
      It’s a very good point: minority parties in non-swing states should be lobbying hard for this.

      FWIW, believe MN has signed on to the NPVIC.

      In conversation about 9 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Michael Busch (michael_w_busch@mastodon.online)'s status on Saturday, 28-Sep-2024 00:35:54 JST Michael Busch Michael Busch
      in reply to
      • Paul Cantrell

      @GottaLaff @inthehands

      It is no longer surprising; but it remains striking to me that the MNGOP takes the position that their supporters should have no say in electing POTUS.

      Because they know that Republican candidates for the last 25 years have become POTUS only because of the electoral college, but #Minnesota has gone only for Democratic candidates for 50 years.

      In conversation about 9 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Rachael L (r343l@freeradical.zone)'s status on Saturday, 28-Sep-2024 00:59:41 JST Rachael L Rachael L
      in reply to
      • Paul Cantrell
      • Michael Busch

      @inthehands @michael_w_busch @GottaLaff As frequently pointed out, there are more conservative and republican voters in California than anywhere but Texas -- and more liberal & democratic voters in Texas than anywhere but California. And none of those voters get any real vote or is there a need for candidates to appeal to those voters.

      In conversation about 9 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Alan Bucknam (bucknam@mastodon.social)'s status on Saturday, 28-Sep-2024 06:58:48 JST Alan Bucknam Alan Bucknam
      in reply to
      • M.S. Bellows, Jr.

      @msbellows @GottaLaff the workaround is the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact. It’s an agreement among participating states to award all their electoral votes to whichever presidential ticket wins the overall popular vote. It would come into effect only when it would guarantee that outcome.

      209 EVs’-worth of states have passed it, another 50 pending…getting close to the magical 270 threshold.

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Popular_Vote_Interstate_Compact

      In conversation about 9 months ago permalink

      Attachments

      1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: upload.wikimedia.org
        National Popular Vote Interstate Compact
        The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (NPVIC) is an agreement among a group of U.S. states and the District of Columbia to award all their electoral votes to whichever presidential ticket wins the overall popular vote in the 50 states and the District of Columbia. The compact is designed to ensure that the candidate who receives the most votes nationwide is elected president, and it would come into effect only when it would guarantee that outcome. Introduced in 2006, as of April 2024 it has been adopted by seventeen states and the District of Columbia. These jurisdictions have 209 electoral votes, which is 39% of the Electoral College and 77% of the 270 votes needed to give the compact legal force. Certain legal questions may affect implementation of the compact. Some legal observers believe states have plenary power to appoint electors as prescribed by the compact; others believe that the compact will require congressional consent under the Constitution's Compact Clause or that the presidential election process...
    • Embed this notice
      M.S. Bellows, Jr. (msbellows@c.im)'s status on Saturday, 28-Sep-2024 06:58:49 JST M.S. Bellows, Jr. M.S. Bellows, Jr.
      in reply to

      @GottaLaff Aaaand want to know why it still won't happen?

      Because amending the Constitution is a state-by-state thing, too, just like the Electoral College the majority wants to remove. And the small states that benefit from that rigged system won't disempower themselves.

      In conversation about 9 months ago permalink
      NefariousPlotter repeated this.

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.