Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   kaia (kaia@brotka.st)'s status on Monday, 09-Sep-2024 05:54:13 JST kaia
   I know most of you pirate their Arch, but you should really consider buying a license and supporting FOSS
   • Embed this notice
     narcolepsy and alcoholism :flag: (hj@shigusegubu.club)'s status on Monday, 09-Sep-2024 05:55:48 JST narcolepsy and alcoholism :flag:

     in reply to
     @kaia nice >:]
   • Embed this notice
     TIZEN (tizen@mastodon.social)'s status on Monday, 09-Sep-2024 06:08:55 JST TIZEN

     in reply to

     @kaia Had 5 Heartattacks readin' this crap

     kaia likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     翠星石 (suiseiseki@freesoftwareextremist.com)'s status on Monday, 09-Sep-2024 16:15:20 JST 翠星石

     in reply to
     @kaia Arch is a proprietary distro; https://www.gnu.org/distros/common-distros.html#Arch
     kaia likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     kaia (kaia@brotka.st)'s status on Monday, 09-Sep-2024 16:18:50 JST kaia

     in reply to

     • 翠星石
     @Suiseiseki I read all gnu.org articles in the slightly whiney and didactic Stallman voice. the same kind of folks are quite common here in Swabia and it's a very unattractive and disconcerting thing for outsiders.
   • Embed this notice
     :segasaturn: (takao@shitposter.world)'s status on Monday, 09-Sep-2024 16:25:07 JST :segasaturn:

     in reply to

     • 翠星石
     @kaia @Suiseiseki holy based, please emulate rms-sama moar
     翠星石 and kaia like this.
   • Embed this notice
     翠星石 (suiseiseki@freesoftwareextremist.com)'s status on Monday, 09-Sep-2024 16:26:37 JST 翠星石

     in reply to
     @kaia >I read all gnu.org articles in the slightly whiney and didactic Stallman voice.
     Yes, that's exactly the tone that rms's articles are written in.
     
     At this stage I'm even recognizing his unparalleled writing style for articles where it doesn't say that it was written by him at the top.
     
     >a very unattractive and disconcerting thing for outsiders.
     Now this is next level.
     
     How dare the articles adequately describe the truth of the topic, rather than being an inadequate description in a watered-down proprietary style that comforts readers!
     
     I'm quite comforted when I read rms's writings, as I have determined that >99.95% of them are well researched and considered and are the truth.
     kaia likes this.