@kaia >I read all gnu.org articles in the slightly whiney and didactic Stallman voice.
Yes, that's exactly the tone that rms's articles are written in.

At this stage I'm even recognizing his unparalleled writing style for articles where it doesn't say that it was written by him at the top.

>a very unattractive and disconcerting thing for outsiders.
Now this is next level.

How dare the articles adequately describe the truth of the topic, rather than being an inadequate description in a watered-down proprietary style that comforts readers!

I'm quite comforted when I read rms's writings, as I have determined that >99.95% of them are well researched and considered and are the truth.