GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPは日本のGNU socialサーバーです。
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. Embed this notice
    Support the Resistance (pattyhanson@mastodon.social)'s status on Friday, 09-Aug-2024 09:18:48 JST Support the Resistance Support the Resistance

    I'd like a reporter to ask JD #Vance what he & his wife use for contraception. He can't say 'nothing' because he doesn't have a shit ton of kids. She's still of childbearing age at 38. She should be able to produce a baby every year.

    If Vance refuses to answer & says it's personal, then ask him why he thinks he has the right to control the personal decisions of other men & women.

    Reporters are failing. Make these men answer questions about the things they want to control in others.
    #USPOL

    In conversation about 9 months ago from mastodon.social permalink
    • Embed this notice
      🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 (freemo@qoto.org)'s status on Friday, 09-Aug-2024 09:18:47 JST 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱
      in reply to

      @PattyHanson

      I cant imagine that going as fun as you'd imagine. I really just expect him to say something like "we use condoms", I dont think most people are super private about that.

      In conversation about 9 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Carolyn (cstamp@mastodon.social)'s status on Friday, 09-Aug-2024 11:20:44 JST Carolyn Carolyn
      in reply to
      • 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱

      @freemo @PattyHanson That's still birth control.

      In conversation about 9 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 (freemo@qoto.org)'s status on Friday, 09-Aug-2024 11:20:44 JST 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱
      in reply to
      • Carolyn

      @CStamp

      Yes it is. I dont get the relevance of pointing that out. Did Vance say something recently I'm missing for context? I dont give much attention to democrat and republican childishness so i may be out of touch with something.

      @PattyHanson

      In conversation about 9 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      John Burns (johnjburnsiii@kzoo.to)'s status on Friday, 09-Aug-2024 11:56:16 JST John Burns John Burns
      in reply to
      • 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱
      • Carolyn

      @freemo @CStamp @PattyHanson

      Future plans - Project 2025 - after doing away with women's medical care (abortion, IVF, etc) - is to restrict / do away with contraception, too.

      In conversation about 9 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 (freemo@qoto.org)'s status on Friday, 09-Aug-2024 11:56:16 JST 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱
      in reply to
      • Carolyn
      • John Burns

      @JohnJBurnsIII

      I think we all know, without invoking project 2025, that the republican agenda is to do away with healthcare. As for restricting contraception, depends what you eman. They certainly would want to restrict it in the sense of not requiring employees or even healthcare to support it. But I highly doubt many republicans want to make condoms literally illegal.

      Not saying thats any better mind you. But lets not sound like conspiracy theorists here or else we will loose respectability in the points we make. Generally invoking "project 2025" probably isnt in our best interest particularly when we already have enough info just invoking the GOP manifesto itself.

      @CStamp @PattyHanson

      In conversation about 9 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 (freemo@qoto.org)'s status on Friday, 09-Aug-2024 12:38:12 JST 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱
      in reply to
      • Carolyn
      • Haderach C. Kwisatch
      • John Burns

      @rayckeith

      There is absolutely a very small minority of the religious community that would probably be ok outlawing condoms. But its a huge leap to go from that to suggest the majority of the GOP would push for that if given the chance. I highly doubt the majority of the current GOP would vote to outlaw condoms if given the chance right now.

      @JohnJBurnsIII @CStamp @PattyHanson

      In conversation about 9 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Haderach C. Kwisatch (rayckeith@techhub.social)'s status on Friday, 09-Aug-2024 12:38:13 JST Haderach C. Kwisatch Haderach C. Kwisatch
      in reply to
      • 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱
      • Carolyn
      • John Burns

      @freemo @JohnJBurnsIII @CStamp @PattyHanson

      some people who call themselves christians DO want to outlaw condoms as well as sex before marriage. they are literally extremists and Speaker of the House Mike is probably one of them.

      In conversation about 9 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 (freemo@qoto.org)'s status on Friday, 09-Aug-2024 13:50:15 JST 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱
      in reply to
      • Carolyn
      • Haderach C. Kwisatch
      • Olivier Mengué
      • John Burns

      @dolmen

      True, the GOP is ok with a rapist and the Dems are ok with a creepy old dude who touches little girls on stage inappropriately (such as holding their arm as they try to get away as he sniffs their hair)... Neither Biden nor Trump is anything people will look back on and judge us favorably for.

      @rayckeith @JohnJBurnsIII @CStamp @PattyHanson

      In conversation about 9 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Olivier Mengué (dolmen@mamot.fr)'s status on Friday, 09-Aug-2024 13:50:16 JST Olivier Mengué Olivier Mengué
      in reply to
      • 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱
      • Carolyn
      • Haderach C. Kwisatch
      • John Burns

      @freemo @rayckeith @JohnJBurnsIII @CStamp @PattyHanson There is a very small minority of the American voters community that think that it is ok to have a rapist as president, but that guy is once again the candidate of the GOP.

      In conversation about 9 months ago permalink

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.