Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   PodunkPotato (podunkpotato@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Saturday, 22-Jun-2024 11:18:21 JST PodunkPotato

   in reply to

   • Hoss Delgado
   • Niggy Hardare
   Nothing is changing that probability. Perceptions may change, but that's it. That is a test I would have repeated by an independent lab if I were Nick, and since it was hair, time is not a concern.
   • Embed this notice
     Niggy Hardare (j@cawfee.club)'s status on Saturday, 22-Jun-2024 11:18:22 JST Niggy Hardare

     in reply to

     • Hoss Delgado

     @Hoss You shouldn’t think that bc it’s obviously not true. There’s all kinds of ways she could’ve tested positive, most likely just an unclean surface.

   • Embed this notice
     Hoss Delgado (hoss@shitpost.cloud)'s status on Saturday, 22-Jun-2024 11:18:22 JST Hoss Delgado

     in reply to

     • Niggy Hardare
     Nothing would make me happier than finding out the test was somehow fucked up. It seems like some people are hoping it's true because it's another "own" against Nick, and that's fucked. I will hold out hope a 9-year-old wasn't dosed with coke even though the probability seems to be dwindling by the day.
   • Embed this notice
     Hoss Delgado (hoss@shitpost.cloud)'s status on Saturday, 22-Jun-2024 11:18:23 JST Hoss Delgado
     I really don't want to believe Rackets was dosing his daughter with coke to treat her ADHD and/or narcolepsy, but paradoxically the more I think "there's no way he'd be that retarded" the more I become convinced he really was that retarded.