When you can understand why there weren't mass arrests of the proud boys, or mass arrests at Jan 6, but there were mass arrests at BLM protests, and there are mass arrests on college campuses... you'll be one step closer to understanding free speech in America.
Most BLM protesters were white people advocating for Black civil rights.♥️ All their lives, they thought that they had the 1st amendment right to protest, because they had seen white supremacists march without being beaten by cops. They didn't realize that the right to free speech depends heavily on what you are speaking about, and who you are speaking for.
Now I'm seeing college professors and students learn the same lesson about what US cops will do to you if you speak up for the wrong thing.
@mekkaokereke I’m an incredibly dumb person, so is it smart for Biden admin to cheer on the violent suppression and smearing of young college students as antisemites now and then expect for them to show up in November in states that he won by a few thousand votes?
@mekkaokereke We had an occupation here in Ottawa where the police did nothing. I think it was because they were afraid. They aren't afraid of Black people, Indigenous people, or college students.
Alignment of values may have played a part, especially in the beginning, but everyone knows right wing extremists are dangerous.
that doesn't qualify as "mass arrests" lol. Plus, it only took, what, two years for this to happen? ADDITIONALLY, of the aforementioned groups, how many of them stormed the US Capitol?
Please, let's not traffic in fallacies in our haste to prove Mekka wrong
@Elizabeth3 it's not that hard to tell, actually. But anyway.
Since you're claiming to not be arguing that Mekka is wrong, in what precise way are those facts relevant?
To be clear, the reason I ask is because I suspect your motives. Mekka is making an extremely important point in drawing attention to the extreme hypocrisy behind American claims of free speech. It's a very common pattern for white folks to come in to replies of Black folks who are doing that sort of work and try to undermine their argument exactly as you did, by making false equivalences to try and prove them wrong.
Then when called out for it, as you have just done, they throw up their hands claim that they're "just asking questions" or "inserting relevant facts" or some similar rhetorical cover. In this way, they hide behind their false premise of neutrality and pretend they don't have any bias behind their actions.
So I'm challenging you like this because I want to hear from you exactly why you felt it important to share that news story, other than to try and disprove the argument and in your words, harsh our "high five".
@tillshadeisgone I never said he was wrong. And it is hard to tell how many people on each side were arrested. Just inserting relevant facts. Sorry if it harshed your high five
No, it's not hard to tell how many people were arrested on Jan 6. There are records. We can just read the indictments.
6 people were arrested. Six.
As in, more than 4 times as many people were arrested at Emory yesterday, than were arrested on Jan 6.
And the Jan 6 folk were committing active, violent, aggressive invasion of a federal building, and attempting insurrection. Not exercising free speech.
2 things. 1, you still aren't disproving Mekka's point. He said there weren't mass arrests at the J6 protests, and there weren't. As noted in the article you just posted.
2, I notice you replied to this comment but stayed silent when I called out your true motivations, preferring to continue pretending you didn't come here just to prove a Black guy wrong about white supremacy. Typical white racist behavior.