Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   寮 (ryo@social.076.ne.jp)'s status on Tuesday, 25-Oct-2022 22:14:58 JST 寮
   Congratulations Twitter for figuring out what all the rest of us already figured out at least 5 years ago already.
   We already have Fedi, so nobody cares.
   
   Twitter創業者の立ち上げた分散型SNSプロトコル開発団体が新SNS「Bluesky」を発表
   (Shitter founder who launched a decentralized SNS protocol development group announced a new SNS "Bluesky".)
   https://hozon.site/archive/1666703369/gigazine.net/news/20221025-at-protocol-bluesky-social//index.html
   • Embed this notice
     Hoss Delgado (hoss@shitpost.cloud)'s status on Tuesday, 25-Oct-2022 22:20:38 JST Hoss Delgado

     in reply to
     Fedi can't be controlled in the ways they want. This necessitates the creation of a new protocol they can be the initial and largest adopters of.
     寮 likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     寮 (ryo@social.076.ne.jp)'s status on Tuesday, 25-Oct-2022 22:21:27 JST 寮

     in reply to

     • Hoss Delgado
     @Hoss I know.
     But look at the efforts Fakebook took to have something "decentralized" (which really isn't decentralized at all), only to have it flop from the get go.
   • Embed this notice
     Hyolobrikator (hyolobrika@gleasonator.com)'s status on Tuesday, 25-Oct-2022 22:38:45 JST Hyolobrikator

     in reply to
     Bluesky actually looks better than Fedi in some ways. For instance, they separate identities from infrastructure which means you can migrate accounts without losing all your follows and followers.
     Your username is literally a domain name that you control rather than being attached to a domain name that someone else controls.
     Okay, those two situations are basically the same with the current DNS, but fedi has the disadvantage that the domain your account is attached to is usually owned by someone who feels responsible for what you post.
     And IIRC you can migrate domains/usernames as well using your private key.
     寮 likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     寮 (ryo@social.076.ne.jp)'s status on Tuesday, 25-Oct-2022 22:42:10 JST 寮

     in reply to

     • Hyolobrikator
     @Hyolobrika With Fedi the ideal set up is that everyone has their own instance rather than having to rely on others, but it offers both.
     For example, anon no kenkai and pawlicker are single user instances.
     
     But what makes Fedi superior is that it's not owned by any of the obsoletes.
     However, you make pretty good points here on Bluesky.
   • Embed this notice
     Hyolobrikator (hyolobrika@gleasonator.com)'s status on Tuesday, 25-Oct-2022 22:43:16 JST Hyolobrikator

     in reply to

     • Hoss Delgado
     How can Bluesky be controlled?
     寮 likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     Hyolobrikator (hyolobrika@gleasonator.com)'s status on Tuesday, 25-Oct-2022 22:43:17 JST Hyolobrikator

     in reply to

     • Hyolobrikator
     https://atproto.com/guides/identity
     寮 likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     Hoss Delgado (hoss@shitpost.cloud)'s status on Tuesday, 25-Oct-2022 22:43:19 JST Hoss Delgado

     in reply to

     • Hyolobrikator
     Because Twitter will be at the center of it.
     寮 likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     Hyolobrikator (hyolobrika@gleasonator.com)'s status on Tuesday, 25-Oct-2022 22:43:28 JST Hyolobrikator

     in reply to

     • Hoss Delgado
     Can mastodon.social control every Mastodon instance? Can misskey.io every Misskey instance? Et cetera
     寮 likes this.