@mira imho that is an exaggeration. its one thing that authorities pushes hetzner to remove content and hetzner therefore a customer, everything under the cover of ToS 8.2 which everyone should have read in before and its a different one framing hetzner
@mira did you read the mails? The Cloudflare mail heavily implies that they dont care, dont want to be involved with, and they gave out informations...
@mira Ok again: As far as i know, an IP Address and Addresses in general are protected under GDPR so they arent allowed to gave those Informations out to thirdparties who arent Authorities. Fact is Cloudflare gave them away, Fact is Hetzner has ToS 8.2 and they use their well known rule which one agrees in before with it, to force the deletion of content. Another fact is, that one concludes a contract with hetzner under these conditions.
So yes, under this conditions i call you out on "if anyone here is involved with pride orgs in germany please fucking obliterate hetzner thx" because, as far as I know, this statement is a totally exaggerated attempt to cause as much damage as possible, whereby one's own morality is weighted higher than the applicable domestic law and possible consequences vis-à-vis authorities.
If it turns out that there are no authorities at work, I still find such a reaction exaggerated because Hetzner has, as described in the mail, in my view given reasons which absolutely cannot be interpreted against minorities in any way.
Subjectively speaking, I don't think that's great either. But now I would like to hear from you why this should be unethical and illegal. Preferably with evidence like I did.
@sn0w@mira fair, but then i would count Cloudfalre releasing the personal Informations as illegal. Nevertheless, the abuse team at hetzner decided to enforce their well known ToS and I still consider that far from illegal. Hetzner's motive seems more credible to me than the defamation that they are deliberately targeting minorities
@Jain@mira > If it turns out that there are no authorities at work there most definitely aren't, and i heavily doubt info was given out to the complainer cloudflare just forwarded the abuse mail they got to the abuse-contact for the relevant IP adress (ie hetzner) you can see the cloudflare mail quoted at the bottom of the hetzner mail, and the hetzner mail starts with "we received a complaint from cloudflare.com"
@Jain@mira don't get me wrong, nothing illegal happened here at any point, by any party them overreacting like this is questionable and it could be debatable whether hosting at any provider with unclear clauses like theirs is a good idea but legally they are completely in the clear here
@mira > since hetzner, unlike cloudflare, did not specify exactly what the issue was, parts of this paragraph other than the one on pornography could still hold legal ground if breached, let me know exactly how you think this was breached uwu Imho nothing, according to Cloudflare there is, so the final say has Hetzner and they obviously decided that they dont want content like this which is still within their legal options.
> since there was no violation of german, eu, or international law, or tos from the side of Ashten, hetzner is in breach of contract by demanding the removal of any content I very much doupt that. It should be perfectly fine to remove any customer if they want, their ToS explicit says "This includes in particular, but is not limited to".
> lmao who am i causing damage to lol? hetzner, and i am still of the opinion that it is unjustified
> ... operating strictly within legal frameworks, which hetzner failed to do in this case. still disagree on that, and it looks like im not the only one
> asking to remove content depicting two women kissing in a context that is permitted by all domestic, eu, and international laws, as well as tos, is discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation ... I consider the allegation of discrimination in this case, as already stated, to be exaggerated. I could well imagine that Hetzner itself or with the help of legal action will have to accept at some point that this content is okay. But if someone were to sue Hetzner on the basis of discrimination, there would be no chance. I am not aware of a single case, anywhere in the world, which has ended in a legally binding way in such a context with the result that it was discriminatory.
1. as you said, it was a breach of gdpr to share personally identifiable information, which ip addresses are (this is illegal to do even if there is actual illegal activity going on, you can not share gdpr protected data with anyone except the authorities UPON receiving a warrant/other OFFICIAL request to provide the information (i.e. even a police officer writing you an email is not an official request in most cases))
2. there is no - pornographic content -> content that is intended for sexual arousal - pornographic content involving children -> same as the previous point but depicting individuals below the age of 18 (under german federal law, might differ in other countries)
3. hetzner tos 8.2 copied directly from their tos site: "8.2. The Customer is obligated not to publish any content that infringes on the rights of third parties or otherwise violates applicable law. This includes in particular, but is not limited to, pornographic or obscene material, extremist content or content that offends common decency, gambling, material that could seriously endanger the morals of children or young people or violate the rights of third parties (copyrights, name rights, trademark rights and data protection rights). This also includes the publication of defamatory content, insults or disparagement of persons or groups of persons." as established since there is no pornographic content, especially none involving minors the part about pornography is not applicable in this case. since hetzner, unlike cloudflare, did not specify exactly what the issue was, parts of this paragraph other than the one on pornography could still hold legal ground if breached, let me know exactly how you think this was breached uwu
4. since there was no violation of german, eu, or international law, or tos from the side of Ashten, hetzner is in breach of contract by demanding the removal of any content
5. lmao who am i causing damage to lol?
6. my own morality has been put aside so far you have no idea, i specifically mentioned pride as an organisation because they are very keen on operating strictly within legal frameworks, which hetzner failed to do in this case.
7. asking to remove content depicting two women kissing in a context that is permitted by all domestic, eu, and international laws, as well as tos, is discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, and thus in addition of being a breach of contract, it is a violation of (not gonna list all the applicable law in the state of bavaria here, but there is a lot both on state, federal and international levels) numerous laws
@mira You cant provide proof as well as i cant provide proof against it. You can describe the legal implication tho as well as i can tho. I pretty much told you the reasons why i doubt it but let me quote it again: > But if someone were to sue Hetzner on the basis of discrimination, there would be no chance. I am not aware of a single case, anywhere in the world, which has ended in a legally binding way in such a context with the result that it was discriminatory. I simply called you out for exaggeration, nothing more nothing less.
@Jain@blob.catyou ask me to provide proof i do my best to explain the legal implication of the situation you say you doubt it and disagree without explaining whywhat do you want from me then?
@mira Even you should be aware that this generalization does not do match to that rather more complex situation in the slightest. We can agree to disagree and wait and see what happens. I see no reason for further discussion when you try to use such thought terminating clichés within a specific Conversation.