@mira
> since hetzner, unlike cloudflare, did not specify exactly what the issue was, parts of this paragraph other than the one on pornography could still hold legal ground if breached, let me know exactly how you think this was breached uwu
Imho nothing, according to Cloudflare there is, so the final say has Hetzner and they obviously decided that they dont want content like this which is still within their legal options.

> since there was no violation of german, eu, or international law, or tos from the side of Ashten, hetzner is in breach of contract by demanding the removal of any content
I very much doupt that. It should be perfectly fine to remove any customer if they want, their ToS explicit says "This includes in particular, but is not limited to".

> lmao who am i causing damage to lol?
hetzner, and i am still of the opinion that it is unjustified

> ... operating strictly within legal frameworks, which hetzner failed to do in this case.
still disagree on that, and it looks like im not the only one

> asking to remove content depicting two women kissing in a context that is permitted by all domestic, eu, and international laws, as well as tos, is discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation ...
I consider the allegation of discrimination in this case, as already stated, to be exaggerated. I could well imagine that Hetzner itself or with the help of legal action will have to accept at some point that this content is okay. But if someone were to sue Hetzner on the basis of discrimination, there would be no chance. I am not aware of a single case, anywhere in the world, which has ended in a legally binding way in such a context with the result that it was discriminatory.