GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPは日本のGNU socialサーバーです。
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. Embed this notice
    Anil Dash (anildash@me.dm)'s status on Tuesday, 12-Mar-2024 22:53:17 JST Anil Dash Anil Dash

    Has anybody written about the near-ubiquitous online trend of bowdlerizing text, either to avoid being penalized by the algorithm (real or imagined) or to avoid content being searchable by others? We have people who communicate about "s*x" instead of "sex" and... that's probably a very bad thing.

    In conversation about a year ago from me.dm permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Eugen Rochko (gargron@mastodon.social)'s status on Tuesday, 12-Mar-2024 22:56:14 JST Eugen Rochko Eugen Rochko
      in reply to
      • かき@GNUsocialJP

      @anildash Would the usage of "unalive" instead of "dead" or "kill" be considered part of that same trend?

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Secret 3rd South African (monsoonrains@mastodon.social)'s status on Tuesday, 12-Mar-2024 22:59:38 JST Secret 3rd South African Secret 3rd South African
      in reply to
      • Eugen Rochko

      @Gargron @anildash I hope so because 'unalive'... omg I hate it viscerally.

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      schrotthaufen (schrotthaufen@mastodon.social)'s status on Tuesday, 12-Mar-2024 23:01:14 JST schrotthaufen schrotthaufen
      in reply to
      • Eugen Rochko

      @Gargron @anildash Absolutely. All the newspeak/self-censorship to avoid algorithmic penalties should be included.

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      FeralRobots (feralrobots@mastodon.social)'s status on Tuesday, 12-Mar-2024 23:06:06 JST FeralRobots FeralRobots
      in reply to
      • Eugen Rochko

      @Gargron @anildash
      I'd argue it's usually not, since I mostly see it used ironically ("17 civilians were discovered to have been rendered unalive") or as a fine distinction ("there's something unalive about that painting"). I.e., not bowdlerization - it has a different purpose than that.

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Eugen Rochko (gargron@mastodon.social)'s status on Tuesday, 12-Mar-2024 23:08:23 JST Eugen Rochko Eugen Rochko
      in reply to
      • かき@GNUsocialJP
      • Ben Ramsey
      • schrotthaufen

      @ramsey @schrotthaufen @anildash It is used primarily to avoid algorithms downranking you on TikTok and YouTube.

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Ben Ramsey (ramsey@phpc.social)'s status on Tuesday, 12-Mar-2024 23:08:27 JST Ben Ramsey Ben Ramsey
      in reply to
      • Eugen Rochko
      • schrotthaufen

      @schrotthaufen @Gargron @anildash I’m not sure whether “unalive” is a way to avoid algorithms or just a way to avoid saying “dead.” Where I grew up, referring to someone as “dead” seems crude and disrespectful, so we would say “passed away” or “moved on” or “in heaven.” I wonder if “unalive” is in a similar vein.

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      schrotthaufen (schrotthaufen@mastodon.social)'s status on Tuesday, 12-Mar-2024 23:23:49 JST schrotthaufen schrotthaufen
      in reply to
      • Eugen Rochko
      • Ben Ramsey

      @Gargron @ramsey @anildash I’ve heard people claim that using words like “killed”, “dead”, “rape”, etc can get accounts automatically suspended on tiktok. I don’t know is this is true.

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Anil Dash (anildash@me.dm)'s status on Wednesday, 13-Mar-2024 05:35:06 JST Anil Dash Anil Dash
      in reply to
      • Eugen Rochko

      @Gargron yes, very much. It's all algorithmically induced.

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Cogito ergo mecagoendios (elrohir@mastodon.gal)'s status on Wednesday, 13-Mar-2024 05:38:28 JST Cogito ergo mecagoendios Cogito ergo mecagoendios
      in reply to

      @anildash This is a ubiquitious topic on tumblr posts directed at newcoming users from tiktok and twitter: the usual points are 1) there is no algorithm here so there is no benefit 2) you don't have a responsibility to create an advertiser-safe climate for the network owner 3) in fact advertiser-safety usually results in minorities being silenced 4) and full words are successfully removed when people use safety filters but your asterisk is actually breaking their filter settings.

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Anil Dash (anildash@me.dm)'s status on Wednesday, 13-Mar-2024 05:39:15 JST Anil Dash Anil Dash
      in reply to
      • Tim Bray

      @timbray one would hope!

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Tim Bray (timbray@cosocial.ca)'s status on Wednesday, 13-Mar-2024 05:39:16 JST Tim Bray Tim Bray
      in reply to

      @anildash Let's assume that Fedi will get algorithms; the difference is that they won't have to cater to the sensibilities of advertisers, I assume. And thus should be able to avoid this silliness?

      In conversation about a year ago permalink

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.