GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPは日本のGNU socialサーバーです。
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. Embed this notice
    Randahl Fink (randahl@mastodon.social)'s status on Tuesday, 27-Feb-2024 10:50:42 JST Randahl Fink Randahl Fink

    We may claim not to be at war with Russia, but I can assure you, Russia is at war with us.

    In conversation about a year ago from mastodon.social permalink
    • Embed this notice
      🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 (freemo@qoto.org)'s status on Tuesday, 27-Feb-2024 10:50:41 JST 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱
      in reply to
      • realcaseyrollins ✝️
      • Trendy Toots

      @realcaseyrollins

      That is a very odd take. Not that I disagree that it is a proxy war, it is, but the take that that is somehow immoral seems wrong.

      Two people had a war, we decided to offer non-human-life support to the under dog. Why is that wrong. Assuming we think Ukranians deserve to be supported then why would providing them with money and weapons be morally worse than letting them die with no support?

      @randahl @trendytoots

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      realcaseyrollins ✝️ (realcaseyrollins@social.teci.world)'s status on Tuesday, 27-Feb-2024 10:50:42 JST realcaseyrollins ✝️ realcaseyrollins ✝️
      in reply to
      • Trendy Toots
      @randahl @trendytoots @randahl @trendytoots
      We are in a proxy war with them. #TimScott said it bluntest: we are using the blood of Ukrainians to degrade the Russian military.
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 (freemo@qoto.org)'s status on Tuesday, 27-Feb-2024 11:00:22 JST 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱
      in reply to
      • realcaseyrollins ✝️
      • Trendy Toots

      @realcaseyrollins

      Its a war with Russia. To win the war would take the full engagement of the entire USA military in a full our war with Russia. I personally wouldn't mind that engagement but its a order of magnitude difference in commitment.

      Since we are obviously not willing to devote the entire USA military to the defense of Ukraine, clearly helping Ukraine extend a war out indefinitely is far superior than letting Ukraine be wiped off a map.

      @randahl @trendytoots

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      realcaseyrollins ✝️ (realcaseyrollins@social.teci.world)'s status on Tuesday, 27-Feb-2024 11:00:23 JST realcaseyrollins ✝️ realcaseyrollins ✝️
      in reply to
      • 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱
      • Trendy Toots
      @freemo @randahl @trendytoots @freemo @randahl @trendytoots
      I think what #TimScott was hinting at, probably accidentally saying the truth, is that we're not giving #Ukraine the type of support they'd need to *win* the war, which would probably be troops on the ground; instead, we're giving them the type of support they need to not lose. That's not the same, and it's why currently there's no end to the war in sight.

      In my opinion, using the military of a far smaller, barely-standing nation as human sacrifices before an enemy you're too wimpy to fight yourselves is wrong. The Ukrainians have suffered too much already, we don't need to trap them in a forever war too.
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
      Another Linux Walt Alt {3EB165E0-5BB1-45D2-9E7D-93B31821F864} likes this.
    • Embed this notice
      realcaseyrollins ✝️ (realcaseyrollins@social.teci.world)'s status on Tuesday, 27-Feb-2024 13:01:03 JST realcaseyrollins ✝️ realcaseyrollins ✝️
      in reply to
      • 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱
      • Trendy Toots
      @freemo @randahl @trendytoots @freemo @randahl @trendytoots
      Well, IDK. I'm of the general opinions that long term, prolonging wars kills more people than winning them.
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
      Another Linux Walt Alt {3EB165E0-5BB1-45D2-9E7D-93B31821F864} likes this.
      🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 repeated this.
    • Embed this notice
      🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 (freemo@qoto.org)'s status on Tuesday, 27-Feb-2024 13:02:40 JST 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱
      in reply to
      • realcaseyrollins ✝️
      • Trendy Toots

      @realcaseyrollins

      When the two parties involved remain static that would be true in many cases. 10x the deaths for a day is less than 10 years of 1/10ths the deaths. Sure thats fair.

      But thats not the case here. We are talking about a relatively small war over a long period of time vs a world war involving the entire world, which based on past world wars is likely to last years.

      To put this to actual numbers. WWII resulted in, on average, 10,000 deaths per day over a 7 year period. Resulting in 53 million deaths total.

      By contrast in the ukranian-russian war, in its current phase has been going on for exactly 2 year as of 2 days ago. In the course of those two years there has been a total estimated death toll of half a million. That is 684 people per day.

      So a large world war results in ~20x more people killed per day then a much smaller, but potentially longer lasting war. Considering a global war tends to not be short, as ~7 years given past incidents that would mean the russion-ukrain war would have to last 140 years in order to cause more casualties than the world war that would result if the USA got directly involved.

      @randahl @trendytoots

      In conversation about a year ago permalink

      Attachments

      1. No result found on File_thumbnail lookup.
        day.so

    • Embed this notice
      🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 (freemo@qoto.org)'s status on Tuesday, 27-Feb-2024 14:32:13 JST 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱
      in reply to
      • realcaseyrollins ✝️
      • Mr. Topsy Turvy
      • Trendy Toots
      • Arthur van der Harg

      @ArtHarg

      It would however be triggered by sending troops into Ukraine and then advancing those troops or firing at troops inside Russian borders. Which the only way for Ukraine to win, considering how outnumbered they are, is to take territory in retaliation to invasion.

      When one side is free to take your land and you are forbbiden by your allies to take their, well your hands are tied and when the other country is 1000x your size it is a guaranteed loss for you eventually.

      @snack @realcaseyrollins @randahl @trendytoots

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Arthur van der Harg (artharg@mastodon.nl)'s status on Tuesday, 27-Feb-2024 14:32:15 JST Arthur van der Harg Arthur van der Harg
      in reply to
      • realcaseyrollins ✝️
      • 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱
      • Mr. Topsy Turvy
      • Trendy Toots

      @snack @realcaseyrollins @randahl @trendytoots @freemo Article 5 is about an attack on a member state. It would not be triggered by sending troops into Ukraine. It may however tempt Putin into doing something stupid, like attacking Poland or the Baltic States. And that _would_ trigger Article 5.

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Mr. Topsy Turvy (snack@ieji.de)'s status on Tuesday, 27-Feb-2024 14:32:16 JST Mr. Topsy Turvy Mr. Topsy Turvy
      in reply to
      • realcaseyrollins ✝️
      • 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱
      • Trendy Toots

      @realcaseyrollins @randahl @trendytoots @freemo
      > we're not giving #Ukraine the type of support they'd need to *win* the war, which would probably be troops on the ground;

      That would trigger article 5 and start World War 3. Allies of the U.S would be under obligation to join as has been the case in the past. China would also become involved as part of it's "no limits" alliance with Russia.

      In conversation about a year ago permalink

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.