Conversation

Notices

Embed this notice
Shoq (shoq@mastodon.social)'s status on Friday, 16-Feb-2024 02:50:08 JST Shoq
- Tim Chambers
@tchambers Help me understand something. If a BlueSky instance appears on an AP federated network via a bridge, why would this be structurally any different than any other AP-based fedi instance that could be defederated if that was an AP admins choice? Or is the main objection really just the idea that the connections are being made with a culture war nemesis?

In conversation about 9 months ago from mastodon.social permalink
- Embed this notice
  Tim Chambers (tchambers@indieweb.social)'s status on Friday, 16-Feb-2024 02:50:07 JST Tim Chambers
  in reply to
  - Mike Fraser :Jets:
  @mike @shoq What he said.
  
  In conversation about 9 months ago permalink
- Embed this notice
  Mike Fraser :Jets: (mike@thecanadian.social)'s status on Friday, 16-Feb-2024 02:50:08 JST Mike Fraser :Jets:
  in reply to
  - Tim Chambers
  @shoq @tchambers IMHO its not any different at all.
  
  In conversation about 9 months ago permalink
- Embed this notice
  Tim Chambers (tchambers@indieweb.social)'s status on Friday, 16-Feb-2024 02:55:52 JST Tim Chambers
  in reply to
  - Cybarbie
  @nf3xn @shoq See this counter view, Cybarbie: https://hachyderm.io/@hrefna/111931620167055570
  In conversation about 9 months ago permalink
  Attachments
  1. No result found on File_thumbnail lookup.
    
    Hrefna (DHC) (@hrefna@hachyderm.io)
    
    from Hrefna (DHC)
    
    Okay, now that I'm less tired, a more salient point: Opt-out is not "you haven't consented," opt-out is "we have a situation where there is generally consent and we are giving you the ability to _revoke_ that consent." For instance, if I'm setting up a mastodon server, the fediverse has a _generally granted consent_ for me to do the things a normal mastodon server does, but they also provide a(n imperfect, more on that some other time) mechanism of consent _revocation_: blocking. 1/
- Embed this notice
  Cybarbie (nf3xn@mastodon.social)'s status on Friday, 16-Feb-2024 02:55:53 JST Cybarbie
  in reply to
  - Tim Chambers
  @shoq @tchambers It's pretty astonishing tbh the lack of understanding of consent and privacy. Very disrespectful framing of the issue too. My understanding is that it is a regular instance like any other whose sole purpose is to scrape private posts back to bluesky. That instance can and should be defederated like any other bad actor imo. As a user I now have to second guess every follow to see if they are one of these parasitic accounts. Fundamentally it subverts the platform.
  
  In conversation about 9 months ago permalink
- Embed this notice
  Tim Chambers (tchambers@indieweb.social)'s status on Friday, 16-Feb-2024 02:57:17 JST Tim Chambers
  in reply to
  - Carlos Francisco 🦣
  @carloshr @shoq Deletes work across the bridge as do edits.
  
  In conversation about 9 months ago permalink
- Embed this notice
  Carlos Francisco 🦣 (carloshr@lile.cl)'s status on Friday, 16-Feb-2024 02:57:20 JST Carlos Francisco 🦣
  in reply to
  - Tim Chambers
  @shoq @tchambers in my opinion there are some valid concerns about it. For example, what happens when a post is deleted or edited. But my feeling is that many people is afraid just based in misinformation or an idea of rivalry between mastodon/fediverse and bluesky.
  
  In conversation about 9 months ago permalink

Public

Conversation

Notices

Feeds