@AlisonW@fedimon.uk @neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk @CenturyAvocado@fosstodon.org @revk@toot.me.uk @bloor@bloor.tw 'Parental controls' would be a lot more useful if they were for stopping your parents downloading malware or regurgitating misinformation on Facebook, rather than preventing children from accessing anything sex-related.
Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
Kim (kim@fediverse.fun)'s status on Friday, 09-Feb-2024 03:31:39 JST Kim
- Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell: likes this.
-
Embed this notice
Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell: (lanodan@queer.hacktivis.me)'s status on Friday, 09-Feb-2024 03:35:47 JST Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell:
@kim @neil @revk @bloor @AlisonW @CenturyAvocado Which is effectively why they should be called firewalls.
Because preventing things like malware and other kind of unwarranted traffic is what they are built for, and the vast majority of people have effectively none. -
Embed this notice
Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell: (lanodan@queer.hacktivis.me)'s status on Friday, 09-Feb-2024 03:44:29 JST Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell:
@bloor @AlisonW @kim @CenturyAvocado @neil @revk I would regard it as such because "parental control"/"anti-malware"/"ad blocking" is a very specific setting among others for the exact same kind of technology.
And technology which really ought to be available and usable for everyone, not only people advanced enough to configure their own router/OS/browser/… -
Embed this notice
🆎 (bloor@bloor.tw)'s status on Friday, 09-Feb-2024 03:44:30 JST 🆎
@lanodan @AlisonW @kim @CenturyAvocado @neil @revk sorry but I don’t regard content filtering as a firewall. I would make a fairly crowbar separation there.