@devnull@davew Definitely. I think using a full blogging platform for writing more complicated thoughts is a better idea. It's also nice if you can move from a small thought to a big thought as the thought grows.
@david_megginson@davew@evan I disagree, #ActivityPub is perfect for medium and long-form content. #Mastodon is just crap at displaying it because its UI is optimized for short-form microblogging.
You can watch an on-stage performance through a camera lens but it doesn't mean the performance itself is sub-par because of it.
All respect, @davew (we've known each-other online for over 25 years), but you just did argue on social media. You posted a contentious claim about "tiny little text boxes". Making a proclamation and then refusing to discuss it further is a bit of a hit-and-run.
@davew If your implied point is that #ActivityPub isn't a replacement for #RSS, then I fully agree: ActivityPub is a good fit for short-form stuff (like social-media discussions), while RSS is a good fit for sharing headlines and links to long-form stuff (like blogs or news stories).
Render unto Caesar, for everything there is a season, fit for purpose, and all that jazz.
@devnull@david_megginson@davew@evan its when the neat, sequentially linked comments become a bushy tree if somebody replies to a comment higher up.
A busy "discussion" (that may last days or weeks) with many participants in different branches of the tree is very cumbersome to get an overview of. Like parallel, non-interacting universes.
Not to mention that every new joiner in the discussion reduces your available reply text length, but maybe that is a feature not a bug :-)