GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPは日本のGNU socialサーバーです。
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. Embed this notice
    Luis Villa (luis_in_brief@social.coop)'s status on Monday, 27-Nov-2023 12:39:34 JST Luis Villa Luis Villa
    • Blake E. Reid 🍍🍕🥫🏁

    One of the challenges of the moment in tech is that by being so libertarian for so long we have forgotten (never knew?) how to advocate for @blakereid’s “positive regulatory agenda”. But he’s right that the world could be better if we had one. https://mastodon.lawprofs.org/@blakereid/111478109714735976

    In conversation Monday, 27-Nov-2023 12:39:34 JST from social.coop permalink

    Attachments

    1. No result found on File_thumbnail lookup.
      Blake E. Reid 🍍🍕🥫🏁 (@blakereid@mastodon.lawprofs.org)
      from Blake E. Reid 🍍🍕🥫🏁
      The challenge for "technological self-determination" (via @pluralistic@mamot.fr) is that it needs the backing of a positive regulatory agenda, not just a negative liberty (pro-1A, anti-IP, anti-gov-surveillance) version that depends on interest convergence with tech cos. A normative agenda must navigate the narrow strait between deregulatory libertarianism on one side *and* rising fascism on the other, in a political environment that is fatally toxic to nuance. Not easy. https://locusmag.com/2023/11/commentary-by-cory-doctorow-dont-be-evil/
    • Embed this notice
      Nathan Schneider (ntnsndr@social.coop)'s status on Monday, 27-Nov-2023 12:39:32 JST Nathan Schneider Nathan Schneider
      in reply to
      • Blake E. Reid 🍍🍕🥫🏁

      @luis_in_brief @blakereid This is why I think there must be a strategy of directly enabling more collective self-determination, not just more constraints on tech companies. Develop paths where people can control their tech and create meaningful competitors to VC-backed startups. The tech policy I am most interested in is policy that enables mutualist enterprise across the economy, not just in tech.

      The bonus is that economic democracy is bad for fascism.

      In conversation Monday, 27-Nov-2023 12:39:32 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Nathan Schneider (ntnsndr@social.coop)'s status on Monday, 27-Nov-2023 23:04:35 JST Nathan Schneider Nathan Schneider
      in reply to
      • Blake E. Reid 🍍🍕🥫🏁

      @blakereid @luis_in_brief Totally agree. I said *not just*. But the enabling alternatives is essential for walking the narrow path you point to.

      In conversation Monday, 27-Nov-2023 23:04:35 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Blake E. Reid 🍍🍕🥫🏁 (blakereid@mastodon.lawprofs.org)'s status on Monday, 27-Nov-2023 23:04:36 JST Blake E. Reid 🍍🍕🥫🏁 Blake E. Reid 🍍🍕🥫🏁
      in reply to
      • Nathan Schneider

      @ntnsndr @luis_in_brief I think constraining tech companies is *critical* to enabling collective self-determination. The ease of capturing network effects in communications industries with externality-fueled business models is an enormous barrier to mutualist enterprise whose primary goal is to avoid those externalities. It’s a zero sum game that can’t be won without leveling the normative playing field.

      In conversation Monday, 27-Nov-2023 23:04:36 JST permalink

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.