Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://social.coop/users/luis_in_brief/statuses/111480135886404419">Luis Villa (luis_in_brief@social.coop)'s status on Monday, 27-Nov-2023 12:39:34 JST</a><a href="https://social.coop/@luis_in_brief" title="luis_in_brief@social.coop"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/75487-48-20230312160655.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Luis Villa" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Luis Villa</a><div><ul><li></ul></div></section><article><p>One of the challenges of the moment in tech is that by being so libertarian for so long we have forgotten (never knew?) how to advocate for <a href="https://mastodon.lawprofs.org/@blakereid">@blakereid</a>’s “positive regulatory agenda”. But he’s right that the world could be better if we had one. <a href="https://mastodon.lawprofs.org/@blakereid/111478109714735976" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://mastodon.lawprofs.org/@blakereid/111478109714735976</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/2382289#notice-4705922">In conversation</a><time datetime="2023-11-27T12:39:34+09:00" title="Monday, 27-Nov-2023 12:39:34 JST">about a year ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://social.coop/@luis_in_brief/111480135886404419" rel="external" title="Sent from social.coop via ActivityPub">social.coop</a></span></span><a href="https://social.coop/@luis_in_brief/111480135886404419">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>No result found on File_thumbnail lookup.</div><h5><a href="https://mastodon.lawprofs.org/@blakereid/111478109714735976">Blake E. Reid 🍍🍕🥫🏁 (@blakereid@mastodon.lawprofs.org)</a></h5><div> from <span>Blake E. Reid 🍍🍕🥫🏁</span></div></header><div>The challenge for "technological self-determination" (via @pluralistic@mamot.fr) is that it needs the backing of a positive regulatory agenda, not just a negative liberty (pro-1A, anti-IP, anti-gov-surveillance) version that depends on interest convergence with tech cos. A normative agenda must navigate the narrow strait between deregulatory libertarianism on one side *and* rising fascism on the other, in a political environment that is fatally toxic to nuance. Not easy. https://locusmag.com/2023/11/commentary-by-cory-doctorow-dont-be-evil/</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Luis Villa (luis_in_brief@social.coop)'s status on Monday, 27-Nov-2023 12:39:34 JSTLuis Villa
- Blake E. Reid 🍍🍕🥫🏁
One of the challenges of the moment in tech is that by being so libertarian for so long we have forgotten (never knew?) how to advocate for @blakereid’s “positive regulatory agenda”. But he’s right that the world could be better if we had one. https://mastodon.lawprofs.org/@blakereid/111478109714735976
In conversationabout a year ago from social.cooppermalink
Attachments
1. No result found on File_thumbnail lookup.
  Blake E. Reid 🍍🍕🥫🏁 (@blakereid@mastodon.lawprofs.org)
  from Blake E. Reid 🍍🍕🥫🏁
  The challenge for "technological self-determination" (via @pluralistic@mamot.fr) is that it needs the backing of a positive regulatory agenda, not just a negative liberty (pro-1A, anti-IP, anti-gov-surveillance) version that depends on interest convergence with tech cos. A normative agenda must navigate the narrow strait between deregulatory libertarianism on one side *and* rising fascism on the other, in a political environment that is fatally toxic to nuance. Not easy. https://locusmag.com/2023/11/commentary-by-cory-doctorow-dont-be-evil/

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice