Have you seen the Jeremy Howard strong hunch over on the bird sight. It hits some of the early conflicts around safety over commerce and why it went to a non-profit model. Also why what was shared at the event last week may have tipped things to oust sama.
@band The safety vs. commerce conflict seems like it ran / runs deep. It runs squarely at some questions and concerns I’ve had. There seems to have been two very much opposing understandings of reality at play.
Oddly, it seems the commercial push was also at odds with itself in a few places, which is really odd, but not surprising.
@vanderwal thanks for the thoughts, which fit with some of anil dash's recent comments. i like emily bender's suggestion of substituting "automation" for "ai", as it can clarify the discussions. augmentation of our own capabilities, for me, fits with what we humans always do. and as you know and say, technology is embedded in politics and morals. so here we are.
@band This is part of all of this that draws attention to many vastly conflicting tensions.
The early-ish OpenAI of safety and a good path forward that drew my interest years back I had assumed had been fully shelved and caution kicked to the curb for commercial success.
When Microsoft made their deal and dumped much of their internal efforts and their ethics teams, I figured old OAI was long gone. Seems it was in just frozen in carbon and now thawed.