Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Kit Rhett Aultman (roadriverrail@signs.codes)'s status on Wednesday, 15-Nov-2023 05:24:21 JST Kit Rhett Aultman

   FCC DOES AWAY WITH BAUD LIMITS ON HF! OMG! I can't believe they finally did it! This is a huge, huge win for hobbyist digital radio communications. #hamradio

   https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-23-93A1.pdf

   • Embed this notice
     Kit Rhett Aultman (roadriverrail@signs.codes)'s status on Wednesday, 15-Nov-2023 06:20:19 JST Kit Rhett Aultman

     in reply to

     • The 500 Hats of LambdaCalculus
     • Moto :rainbowinfinity:

     @cmdrmoto @LambdaCalculus It's been an *EXTREMELY* long time coming. The rule should always have been "do whatever you want, but sign your signals and keep it to a bandwidth comparable with SSB (e.g. 2.8 kHz)". We're free to experiment with the available bandwidth slot like we always should have been.

   • Embed this notice
     Moto :rainbowinfinity: (cmdrmoto@hachyderm.io)'s status on Wednesday, 15-Nov-2023 06:20:20 JST Moto :rainbowinfinity:

     in reply to

     • The 500 Hats of LambdaCalculus

     @roadriverrail @LambdaCalculus At last! 300 baud is fun for remembering my old BBS days, but not much else

   • Embed this notice
     Kit Rhett Aultman (roadriverrail@signs.codes)'s status on Wednesday, 15-Nov-2023 06:25:47 JST Kit Rhett Aultman

     in reply to

     • The 500 Hats of LambdaCalculus
     • Moto :rainbowinfinity:

     @cmdrmoto @LambdaCalculus I honestly suspect it was a rule made at a time when the main digital mode was RTTY and there was a strong correlation between symbol rate and bandwidth use, and it's just sat there as a fossil rule ever since.

   • Embed this notice
     Moto :rainbowinfinity: (cmdrmoto@hachyderm.io)'s status on Wednesday, 15-Nov-2023 06:25:49 JST Moto :rainbowinfinity:

     in reply to

     • The 500 Hats of LambdaCalculus

     @roadriverrail @LambdaCalculus For some reason my gut is telling me that if I dig deeper into the “why”, I will discover that it was influenced by heavy lobbying from AT&T, back when folks were buying second phone lines just for their modems

   • Embed this notice
     Kit Rhett Aultman (roadriverrail@signs.codes)'s status on Wednesday, 15-Nov-2023 06:33:16 JST Kit Rhett Aultman

     in reply to

     • The 500 Hats of LambdaCalculus
     • Moto :rainbowinfinity:

     @cmdrmoto @LambdaCalculus AT&T and the Bell System were total shitheads and it's reasonable to want to blame them first. Like...that time they sued a company for putting a little cup on phone receivers? Shithead move.

     But if it was about kneecapping data transmission on radio, they'd have gone after VHF/UHF, too. Ham packet networks on those bands were massive and used as essential infrastructure.

   • Embed this notice
     Moto :rainbowinfinity: (cmdrmoto@hachyderm.io)'s status on Wednesday, 15-Nov-2023 06:33:17 JST Moto :rainbowinfinity:

     in reply to

     • The 500 Hats of LambdaCalculus

     @roadriverrail @LambdaCalculus Yeah, my biases are showing, I think you’re right.

     I was halfway down the rabbit hole and moving towards a similar conclusion.

   • Embed this notice
     Kit Rhett Aultman (roadriverrail@signs.codes)'s status on Wednesday, 15-Nov-2023 12:26:21 JST Kit Rhett Aultman

     in reply to

     • Ben Bradley
     • The 500 Hats of LambdaCalculus
     • Moto :rainbowinfinity:

     @benbradley @cmdrmoto @LambdaCalculus Very hard agree that it's decades past due.

   • Embed this notice
     Ben Bradley (benbradley@mastodon.online)'s status on Wednesday, 15-Nov-2023 12:26:22 JST Ben Bradley

     in reply to

     • The 500 Hats of LambdaCalculus
     • Moto :rainbowinfinity:

     @roadriverrail @cmdrmoto @LambdaCalculus I agree, it would have made sense to do this when ASCII was made legal on ham bands, back in 1980 or so.

   • Embed this notice
     Kit Rhett Aultman (roadriverrail@signs.codes)'s status on Wednesday, 15-Nov-2023 13:02:47 JST Kit Rhett Aultman

     in reply to

     • unsponsor

     @amsomniac Yes, a bandwidth of 2.8 kHz, basically saying "do all the data you want, but don't take up more space than an SSB transmission," which is far more fair.

   • Embed this notice
     unsponsor (amsomniac@mastodon.mit.edu)'s status on Wednesday, 15-Nov-2023 13:02:49 JST unsponsor

     in reply to

     @roadriverrail now it's just physical limits? sweet

   • Embed this notice
     Kit Rhett Aultman (roadriverrail@signs.codes)'s status on Wednesday, 15-Nov-2023 13:07:19 JST Kit Rhett Aultman

     in reply to

     • unsponsor

     @amsomniac I'm reinstalling mine the moment the leaves stop falling. The lawn guys accidentally destroyed my last one (weed eaters hit the tie down lines, antenna fell out of the trees, lawn mower drove over it)

   • Embed this notice
     unsponsor (amsomniac@mastodon.mit.edu)'s status on Wednesday, 15-Nov-2023 13:07:20 JST unsponsor

     in reply to

     @roadriverrail hell yea. I need to put up an antenna

   • Embed this notice
     Kit Rhett Aultman (roadriverrail@signs.codes)'s status on Wednesday, 15-Nov-2023 13:11:08 JST Kit Rhett Aultman

     in reply to

     • unsponsor

     @amsomniac Hanging a wire from the trees is like 85% luck, so thanks. :goose_hacker:

   • Embed this notice
     unsponsor (amsomniac@mastodon.mit.edu)'s status on Wednesday, 15-Nov-2023 13:11:11 JST unsponsor

     in reply to

     @roadriverrail good luck!

   • Embed this notice
     Kit Rhett Aultman (roadriverrail@signs.codes)'s status on Wednesday, 15-Nov-2023 13:14:04 JST Kit Rhett Aultman

     in reply to

     • unsponsor

     @amsomniac I seriously might consider a compressed gas gun this time, though it's also about finding some new trees. too many branches, and it's hard to get the lines up.

   • Embed this notice
     unsponsor (amsomniac@mastodon.mit.edu)'s status on Wednesday, 15-Nov-2023 13:14:06 JST unsponsor

     in reply to

     @roadriverrail I've been throwing paracord tied to a lock for weight but I've seen some use slingshots

   • Embed this notice
     Kit Rhett Aultman (roadriverrail@signs.codes)'s status on Wednesday, 15-Nov-2023 13:41:49 JST Kit Rhett Aultman

     in reply to

     • wholesomedonut

     @wholesomedonut If you can fit it in 2.8 kHz, it can now be done.

     I wouldn't say it'd make a backbone for modern data needs, but maybe for transfers where you're willing to "get it eventually" over long distances would be useful.

   • Embed this notice
     wholesomedonut (wholesomedonut@fosstodon.org)'s status on Wednesday, 15-Nov-2023 13:41:50 JST wholesomedonut

     in reply to

     @roadriverrail

     DUUUUUUUUUUUUUDE.

     See, I was thinking _small_ with doing a LoRa kinda network on like, a neighborhood or town scale, as a kind of poor man's WAN that could stand on its own two legs despite issues with hard infrastructure due to disaster or some kind of nefarious act.

     With this kinda stuff now wide open?

     Homey

     We're worldwide now

   • Embed this notice
     Kit Rhett Aultman (roadriverrail@signs.codes)'s status on Wednesday, 15-Nov-2023 21:43:19 JST Kit Rhett Aultman

     in reply to

     • mmu_man
     • sxpert

     @sxpert @mmu_man I don't know for sure, but I suspect it's a fossil from an era when modulation rate was tightly coupled to bandwidth. It wouldn't surprise me if it was a rule based on old RTTY hardware.

     Note the FCC has proposed rulemaking out now for VHF/UHF too, so we might see a Renaissance in packet radio there, too.

   • Embed this notice
     sxpert (sxpert@mastodon.sxpert.org)'s status on Wednesday, 15-Nov-2023 21:43:23 JST sxpert

     in reply to

     • mmu_man
     @roadriverrail @mmu_man why was there a dumb limitation like that to start with, impeding the experimentation part of the hobby ?