GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPは日本のGNU socialサーバーです。
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. Embed this notice
    NEETzsche (neetzsche@iddqd.social)'s status on Thursday, 24-Aug-2023 07:01:17 JST NEETzsche NEETzsche
    in reply to
    • d
    • of nothing
    • Bloodytailspike
    • houseoftolstoy
    @apropos I recall in precalc they at least used to have a way to vocalize the parenthetical version vs the unparenthetical:

    "six plus three divided by two" --> 6+3/2
    "six plus three in quantity divided by two" --> (6+3)/2

    The thing is, these little gotcha math questions are not taken seriously by any mathematicians or university courses. They teach you how to deal with these in high school algebra, and even then only sometimes, because really, anybody who's actually using math to convey any information will not use these confusing forms.

    @houseoftolstoy @deprecated_ii @monsterislandcolonizer
    In conversation Thursday, 24-Aug-2023 07:01:17 JST from iddqd.social permalink
    • Embed this notice
      of nothing (apropos@freespeechextremist.com)'s status on Thursday, 24-Aug-2023 07:01:18 JST of nothing of nothing
      in reply to
      • d
      • Bloodytailspike
      • houseoftolstoy
      @houseoftolstoy @deprecated_ii @monsterislandcolonizer that symbol work as well as English. "6 divided by 1 plus 2". Is it (6/1)+2 or is it 6/(1+2)? When the notation leads to error, fix the notation.

      For example by using an RPN calculator :)
      In conversation Thursday, 24-Aug-2023 07:01:18 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      houseoftolstoy@merovingian.club's status on Thursday, 24-Aug-2023 07:01:19 JST houseoftolstoy houseoftolstoy
      in reply to
      • d
      • Bloodytailspike

      @deprecated_ii @monsterislandcolonizer Every one of these debates could be avoided if we just use a big line for division instead of the ÷ symbol. That symbol in an equation feels completely unnatural when you want to piece together an equation. The line with the numerator and denominator defined (be it a single number or an equation) is easier to work with.

      In conversation Thursday, 24-Aug-2023 07:01:19 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Bloodytailspike (monsterislandcolonizer@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 24-Aug-2023 07:01:20 JST Bloodytailspike Bloodytailspike
      in reply to
      • d
      @deprecated_ii So is it 9 or 1
      I'm a 9 guy
      In conversation Thursday, 24-Aug-2023 07:01:20 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      d (deprecated_ii@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 24-Aug-2023 07:01:20 JST d d
      in reply to
      • Bloodytailspike
      @monsterislandcolonizer it's 1

      2(1+2) is the same thing as (2*1 + 2*2)

      that's the distributive property
      In conversation Thursday, 24-Aug-2023 07:01:20 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      d (deprecated_ii@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 24-Aug-2023 07:01:21 JST d d
      oh brother, it's this nonsense again. the calculator is right, modern software that works blindly left to right is wrong. this becomes obvious in algebra with variables

      the distributive property is being murdered by retards who slept through middle school algebra and this will probably result in a plane crashing into a stadium full of orphans at some point
      In conversation Thursday, 24-Aug-2023 07:01:21 JST permalink

      Attachments


      1. https://i.poastcdn.org/26eade69b4ce33845b94bac37f42d766f57b5a06cbaff6d8dc809a61eec678e1.png

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.