@jeffcliff@PinochetsCommieCopter Speaking as someone both pro-choice and anti-open borders; I believe very strongly in a person's right to bodily autonomy without control by a state or local government, and also identify that borders are what defines a country. My issue with open borders isn't even really about immigration, it's more about the labor exploitation of immigrants by corpos that open-border policies facilitate, and the reality that a lot of it is a front for human trafficking. Having more or less people doesn't really factor into either argument for me.
> The only rational account for all this shit is that it's a campaign to genocide whites within their own countries.
No, (((it))) isn't the only rational account. You just dropped a lot of different trends and not all of them are entirely due to jews. Canada was going to legalize assisted suicide purely because of the boomers getting old enough to need it, for example. This was predictable decades away, no jews needed.
He dropped a number of explicitly race-motivated anti-White policies and practices that are done on a top-down basis. Anti-Whiteness is something the powers that be will absolutely not compromise on. Try opposing anti-White policymaking at your place of work and see how long you keep your job.
All available evidence points directly to a racial motivation for what they’re doing. That and they explicitly state the racial motivation on top of the other evidence. Limited, if any, evidence points to any other motivation. Hence the conclusion that it’s about race.
@jeffcliff@Heil_Honkler@PinochetsCommieCopter Jews hide behind mass immigration, abortion, and antinatalist propaganda [see also the suicide propaganda in Canada] in order to ensure that their genocide is masked behind a veneer of plausible deniability.
It's genocide by definition, albeit through soft-power methods instead of raw force. It still fits the definition. Intent is the aspect that matters, and the aspect of intent is absolutely there. Jews kinda flip-flop between "it's not happening" and "I'm glad it's happening" based on whatever mood they're in.
At any rate, your whole "argument" can be summed up as the informal fallacy of "moving the goalposts."
As for antinatalist propaganda, it comes in many forms: feminism [from which the push for abortions and contraceptives originates]. LGBT "rights". LGBT indoctrination propaganda. Telling people to "not reproduce because it's bad for the environment". [This bullshit lie goes back to the '70s.] And then there's economic dis-incentives, such as how feminism helped double the workforce and tax revenue while halving wages.
Or how mass immigration is used to benefit large industries, replacing domestic workers that feel overworked and underpaid with foreigners willing to put up with absolute dogshit conditions for dogshit pay. Though now that the vast majority of manufacturing jobs were moved overseas, and most immigrants being shoved in the IT industry are literally too fucking low-IQ to do a good job there, and otherwise most immigrants, legal or otherwise, are thrown into various forms of service jobs [such as construction, repair services, etc...].
Combine that with college and corporate policy actively engaging in anti-white discrimination to fill in "diversity" quotas, informally diminishing white employment and opportunities, and further ensuring that even the whites that went through education for an actual worthwhile career are forced to remain in debt.
Then there's academia and universities that went full tilt on the whole "just existing as white is evil and racist".
On top of that, there's now a push to replace employees of companies in general with AI and automation, yet even with all this going on, none of the open borders shit is put to a stop. So the unemployment issue gets far worse.
The only rational account for all this shit is that it's a campaign to genocide whites within their own countries. Given the blatant anti-white hateful propaganda coming out of universities and hollywood, the only rational conclusion is that the powers that be hate the majority population in the U.S. and various other Western European countries, and want them to die, and that policy is woven specifically for the purpose of doing this without the need for overt use of force.
Anyone denying this is just playing bullshit mind games, and I've got zero tolerance for it. It's so painfully obvious today, that the only way to deny it is to either be a braindead retard, or willfully dishonest.
>In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
>a; Killing members of the group; >b; Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; >c; Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to >bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; >d; Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; >e; Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.